Extremely unlikely. The vast majority of households are heterosexual and seen no clustering of being trans-identified children around same-sex parent groups. There may be some modest correlation with households without a father in so far as male parents are probably more disposed to put a stop to such things, but I've seen nothing I could actually make a case on. Just anecdotes. Do not confuse trans with homosexuals. Most trans people are heterosexual. Even if they claim to be "bi" or "non-binary" or "lesbians".
76 trans children at one school
- Thread starter G-MAN2004
- Start date
Extremely unlikely. The vast majority of households are heterosexual and seen no clustering of being trans-identified children around same-sex parent groups. There may be some modest correlation with households without a father in so far as male parents are probably more disposed to put a stop to such things, but I've seen nothing I could actually make a case on. Just anecdotes. Do not confuse trans with homosexuals. Most trans people are heterosexual. Even if they claim to be "bi" or "non-binary" or "lesbians".
In the real world, transphobia is classed as a hate crime and is illegal in the UK. I'm disappointed that so many keyboard transphobes are allowed to use the OCUK GD forum as their safe space.
So many horrible threads in GD, and always the same old faces spouting-off in them.
You know how sometimes people yell "racist" as a way to deflect criticism? Well dial that up to 9,000 when it comes to "transphobia". Saying a man is not a woman is called transphobia by TRAs. And in fact, you can be banned from Twitter for saying so.
OK, so what is the law that you're referring to and what posts do you think are breaking it?
In the real world, transphobia is classed as a hate crime and is illegal in the UK. I'm disappointed that so many keyboard transphobes are allowed to use the OCUK GD forum as their safe space.
So many horrible threads in GD, and always the same old faces spouting-off in them.
Could you maybe quote the specific posts that you feel are Transphobic?
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,759
Having an opinion that a construct of the mind that goes against biology is nothing but a mental illness is neither a phobia nor a hate crime
Please do show us where we have done any of these though
Or are you just flippantly throwing around the hate crime card in order to shut down any rational discussion which goes against your viewpoint ?
While I'm posting images, I guess two more:
This cheerful fellow singing a song at a Bristol Antifa meeting about smashing in the teeth of TERFS (women who don't accept that a transwoman is actually a woman). He posted this and the lyrics himself and seemed to be pretty popular with the Hard Left Antifa types. He also throws in a few threats at "Swerfs" which are women who object to Sex Work. He was later convicted of rape, by the way.
And a cartoon someone drew that pretty much captures the TRA approach to science, ime.
Okay. I'm done. Image flood over.
This cheerful fellow singing a song at a Bristol Antifa meeting about smashing in the teeth of TERFS (women who don't accept that a transwoman is actually a woman). He posted this and the lyrics himself and seemed to be pretty popular with the Hard Left Antifa types. He also throws in a few threats at "Swerfs" which are women who object to Sex Work. He was later convicted of rape, by the way.
And a cartoon someone drew that pretty much captures the TRA approach to science, ime.
Okay. I'm done. Image flood over.
Nope, it's just quite insensitive and a little moronic
If someone is deluded enough to come out with statements like "I have a female penis" (to pick just one example of many), then I'm not sure criticising people for being insensitive if they disagree is fair. I'd more criticise the person who said it as being oversensitive if they got offended. So would most. Now, onto the moronic part. Please explain to us all what is moronic about saying pointing out a delusion isn't a hate crime?
Not wanting to have children technically goes against biology.
Being gay technically goes against biology.
Both of these are 'contstructs of the mind' as they are personal preference, do you consider them to be mental illnesses?
Do they contradict reality? No, they do not. Does a man claiming to be a woman, yes. See why calling the latter a delusion is not a hate crime, yet?
Is it worth me pointing out that one of the problems with TRAs attempting to de-medicalise being trans is that actual gender dysphoric children lose out on NHS support? Or do you not think that far ahead?
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,759
Not wanting children and being gay does not go against biology, they go against primal instincts to keep the species ongoing
There's plenty of people who don't want children and people who are gay but still enjoy having sex which suggests that they are not entirely suppressing the natural instinct to procreate
There's also references of homosexual behaviour amongst other animals so it's actually perfectly natural to be gay, likewise evidence of animals having sex for fun so again completely natural
There is however no evidence of other animals being confused with their biological sex, we seem to be the only animal to have this issue
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Apr 2007
- Posts
- 6,647
A school in Brighton. No doubt yeah most of the teachers are liberal nutjobs who get off on indoctrinating kids.
Yeah, not every transgender person/transvestite is pushing this 'agenda'. Never met a single person of either community (or anyone at all in fact) that thinks encouraging children to CHOOSE a gender to be clinically and (if necessary) surgically aligned to be a good idea. They do however just want to be treated like normal human beings and have often confirmed they knew from a very early age that they where 'different'. No doubt their lives would have been significantly improved if they where allowed to dress/act in whatever way they saw fit and been largely accepted for it.
The media is purposefully picking out stories like this to rabble rouse because they know it draws in an audience. It is not in anyway indicative of the 'general' perspective on the matter. It is ASTONISHING that some of what I would like to think the more 'intelligent' people on this forum seem to fall into this same trap every single time a story like this comes up.
Last edited:
Nobody ever had their breasts removed in order to listen to Morrisey or took puberty blockers that made them an 18 year old child who'd never experience adolescence.
Nor has a man ever, to my knowledge, walked into a woman's changing room claiming that they're allowed to be in there if they can recite an entire Sisters of Mercy song.
That might be done to the human race having a much more complex form of identity compared to animals, or at least we are able to communicate our sense of self. There may very be similar issues in other animals, but no real way for us to know.
Though male seahorses certainly seem to take on the biological role of carrying-egg-to-gestation.
Well there we go. If DrToffnar hasn't met someone, they don't exist. And we can put our own experiences of the modern and large TRA movement down to hallucination. Clearly the bomb threat to the Brighton WPUK meeting was just Mothman playing with the telephone lines, as well! Clearly the CEO of Mermaids who took her 16yo son to Thailand to be castrated was actually against children having surgery and did it by accident, because you've never met her. Clearly the huge volume of online abuse directed at people who disagree with TRA agenda that I linked to earlier isn't real because you haven't experienced it. Naturally the researcher into detransitioning who found his funding suddenly revoked when TRAs started chastising the university has nothing to do with childhood transitioning advocacy. Clearly the ACTUAL conversations I screenshotted above were carefully typed out by myself. They couldn't possibly be real because you've never met someone like that. Narcissist, much? Try a little empathy and looking at other people's experiences.
Is that REALLY the impression you have of us from what we've actually written? Cause I don't believe it can be.
So if I'm a deluded fool of the media, how come I have been working and campaigning in this area long before this became a bigger story in the media? How come groups like WPUK have had to struggle and fight to get even a little bit of media coverage if we are in fact a RESULT of media coverage? You do not know what you're talking about and have just come into this thread with a whole bag of preconceived notions and are determined to argue against what you expect people to have said. Try actually reading it all, first. And know that your attitude is directly leading to children being harmed.
Well then when we all identify as sea-horses (wont be long), that point will no doubt be relevant.