what you mean what happened to it ? i edit on it.
You being so gaming focused i'm just wondering because Skylake-X are not good gaming CPU's, even at 400Mhz higher clocks they struggle to keep up with Ryzen.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***
- Thread starter Jamin280672
- Start date
You being so gaming focused i'm just wondering because Skylake-X are not good gaming CPU's, even at 400Mhz higher clocks they struggle to keep up with Ryzen.
Associate
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2017
- Posts
- 1,762
I get 1878 totally stock with no apps open or 1817 with steam, discord and VMware horizon running. My chip won't do 4.3 all core though
i have i have shown that cinebench scores count for notihng in gaming. 2700x is slower than a i5 8400 in most games. proven and benchmarked. yet a 2700x is better in cinebench. id say that pretty much is a solid opinion with proof showing cinebench isnt everything.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 15 May 2006
- Posts
- 4,107
- Location
- London
The biggest problem for intel is that a 16 core ryzen will be beating some of their HEDT range
Pretty much all of them ^^^
Edited, sorry cut the top that first time round, pretty important, 37 game average.
You being so gaming focused i'm just wondering because Skylake-X are not good gaming CPU's, even at 400Mhz higher clocks they struggle to keep up with Ryzen.
Edited, sorry cut the top that first time round, pretty important, 37 game average.
No mention of DDR frequency yet for Zen2 I can only assume that it will be better than Zen+.
The other thing I noticed is if Zen+ scores 2074 @ 4.4 then that means that the Zen2 demo was either clocked lower or has no IPC gain at all. The reddit page posted a little while back said that the demo was running at 4.5ghz... Something doesn’t add up.
its a editing rig.Anyone know how to ignore someone permenately? I know how to find the ignore button but if I don’t log in and just browse quickly from my phone, I have to sift through post after post of nonsense. Its an inconvenience.
Click on the name above the avatar, on the right there is a link called "Ignore"
Yeah thankfully I have found that I was just wondering if their was a way of it working when you are not logged in.
Anyone know how to ignore someone permenately? I know how to find the ignore button but if I don’t log in and just browse quickly from my phone, I have to sift through post after post of nonsense. Its an inconvenience.
It is not possible. Works only once you are logging in.
Thought as much. What a shame.
It would have been clocked much Lower. Back in the day when i used to bench a lot, Intel used me for testing the X58 platform and over a period of time i was sent an ES X975 and then latter an ES X990. On release the 975 had a base clock of 3.33Ghz, the ES i was sent had a base clock of 2.8Ghz 5 months before going retail. The 990 on release had a base clock of 3.46Ghz, the ES i was sent had a base clock of 3.1Ghz 3 months before going retail. ES's are not designed with max clocks in mind, they are used for proof of concept and De-bugging.
That said, of course i clocked the nuts off of both under phase......................my results from that came very close to the final clocks i got from retail chips at launch.
^^this is what i agree with most.
From my perspective as a gamer with a 9900k 5.2ghz, i have a feeling this will be a side grade. If games turn out similar to the cinebench in games, i wont be buying. 1440p and 4k i dont even see much gain over lower tier chips. Its ahead of the curve for the demands of gaming aswell as a number of other intel chips. 2700 amds are abead of the curve too.
If these chips turn out like the hype, it excites me to what my next upgrade will be. The cpu market just got exciting again. I just hope games develop as quick as the cpu market is
16+ core that clocks the same as an 8, will be crushing at the HEDT market.
So what do you think it was clocked at? Logically thinking it has to be something like 4.0-4.2.
Unplug your router
Six months out from going retail an "internal ES" could well be within that window yes. ES's in the wild at the moment would be few and far between and under punishment of death
for ANY NDA infringement lol. Even this far out from retail and further though, AMD have a very good idea of the window for clock speeds.Intel for instance, knew full well that the X990 ES they sent me was well capable of hitting over 5Ghz on phase because the e-mail exchange we had was only based around that figure.
So it’s defiantly not unreasonably to assume that retail cards will outperform what we saw at CES and probably on par (at least in cinebench) with a 5+ghz 9900k.Six months out from going retail an "internal ES" could well be within that window yes. ES's in the wild at the moment would be few and far between and under punishment of death
Intel for instance, knew full well that the X990 ES they sent me was well capable of hitting over 5Ghz on phase because the e-mail exchange we had was only based around that figure.
Tick stayed logged in, problem solved...