How about you read the post that you quoted?
Since when was NOT having an accident excuse driving without due care and attention? In this case that is immaterial anyhow.
I’ll take a stab and suggest you don’t understand what I mean by “luck”.
Everyone relies on “luck” when driving. It doesn’t indicate you’re driving without due care and attention but calculated risk.
Sometimes, even with the best care and attention “luck” just runs out. Related examples could be things like blind corners where you have to use your judgement to decide if the road is clear, or perhaps more relevant (considering his defence at the roadside), trying to work out if a road is clear when a low sun is streaming into your eyes. Other examples could include to doing 30 on a clear road in a 30 zone. One day, after dozens of trips there’s a little ice on the corner and you spin off. “Luck” in this case means judgement, not just somone constantly dangerously chancing things and getting away with it.
That’s not to say I’m making a judgement on whether he should or shouldn’t be prosecuted, but that just because he pulled out in front of someone does not indicate he was driving dangerously, or without due care and attention. Let the police decide, rather than let your obvious republican urges make a decision for you.