He comes up with so much crap he no longer knows what he made up and what's real.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***
- Thread starter Jamin280672
- Start date
He comes up with so much crap he no longer knows what he made up and what's real.
If that is the case then buy elsewhere. It will be cheaper to import it yourself. Even including tax and duty.
I was wondering this earlier.
Because he enjoys talking out of his ass, in addition to constantly trolling this sub section and typing like a 3 year old.
hopefully i'll drop in my corsair dominator rgb 4*8gb sticks and hopefully run at 3600mhz, fingers crossed
Thanks. I'm not going to worry too much about a memory OC, just want to get something decent enough. I don't feel the need to spend £350+ on 8pack memory.
I actually was thinking the same. If you were serious. Slow stuff or fast stuff? Which speed? Does b die really matter going forward?
I dont know what you are smoking but dont offer it to others. 14nm vs 7nm waffer cost ~double, 14nm vs 7nm designing is multiple times more expensive, 14nm vs 7nm yields are much worse, Zen+ is 12nm 213mm die, Zen 2 prosessor is atleast 14nm ~130mm + 7nm 88mm die. Counting it all together how on earth making Zen 2 cpu would be cheaper than Zen or Zen+?
You dont need X570 and prices are going to go up because mobo manufacturers make premium models and especially pcie 4 lines are much much more expensive. I think it was gamersnexus that quoted 10x price for lane vs pcie3 and it was real dollars. More layers, more ports, bigger vrm, beefier cooling, it all adds up.
* AMD processors comes with cpu cooler
Sure son
5820k used for gaming. not cinebench what we all buy cpus for lol. while you on about it just show them ryzen top gaming benchmarks in your video lol. you can even see overclocked the 5820k can compete with a 8700k in some games. can you say that about ryzen ? no.
only the newer cpus and in games from what we seen in the pubg benchmark they are about 8700 non k varient. so work that out. 5820k ocd speed LOLOLOLLOOL.
only the newer cpus and in games from what we seen in the pubg benchmark they are about 8700 non k varient. so work that out. 5820k ocd speed LOLOLOLLOOL.
"Lol"... Like a 8700k can't overclock. Get over yourself with your faux magic.
il be honest im not sure with the whole tarrifs thing kicking in with trumpy so who knows.
dg > "hahahaah the best AMD can do now is match an 8700 in PUBG"
> "no that was the 3600"
dg > "hahaha 8700, not even the 9900k..."
> "no, that's the 3600 vs 8700, here are some rumored benchmarks that show a 6% lead for entry level Ryzen 3600 over the 8700"
dg > "lalalal hahah 8700 something pubg something amd havent got anything something something punctuation something"
> "no that was the 3600"
dg > "hahaha 8700, not even the 9900k..."
> "no, that's the 3600 vs 8700, here are some rumored benchmarks that show a 6% lead for entry level Ryzen 3600 over the 8700"
dg > "lalalal hahah 8700 something pubg something amd havent got anything something something punctuation something"
Associate
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2019
- Posts
- 617
The catch here is tbat you're blind.until i see actual proof of that im okay
as said the amd cpu benchmarked in pubg was slower. it was a 8700. not a k version. they chose a non k version for very obvious reasons.
You can't fool us.
Ignoring the bickering about what games is 3 FPS faster, at 14757809698 FPS or whatever crap people are arguing about that is pointless and getting back to things that actually matter...
Just been sorting a few potential candidate specifications for some of the higher end systems, and trialing the X570 chipset to see what it is capable of as a workstation or HEDT replacement for some of the aging X299 platforms currently in use on certain projects and it occurred to me;
Since the 3900X has the full compliment of 64MB L3 cache that a 16-core version does/will, maybe someone will find a way to unlock those extra cores with no performance detriment since the I/O die will be the same. Obviously it depends on how successful the 7nm production is and how many of the less than perfect die are floating around after being used in the 3600 and 3600X first, I can't imagine they are going to be low demand CPU's, so maybe even some of those will be able to be un-locked.
We might end up with the first 16-core AM4 CPU being an unofficial 12 core, and getting back to the good old days of modding and overclocking, I'm crossing my fingers.
Just been sorting a few potential candidate specifications for some of the higher end systems, and trialing the X570 chipset to see what it is capable of as a workstation or HEDT replacement for some of the aging X299 platforms currently in use on certain projects and it occurred to me;
Since the 3900X has the full compliment of 64MB L3 cache that a 16-core version does/will, maybe someone will find a way to unlock those extra cores with no performance detriment since the I/O die will be the same. Obviously it depends on how successful the 7nm production is and how many of the less than perfect die are floating around after being used in the 3600 and 3600X first, I can't imagine they are going to be low demand CPU's, so maybe even some of those will be able to be un-locked.
We might end up with the first 16-core AM4 CPU being an unofficial 12 core, and getting back to the good old days of modding and overclocking, I'm crossing my fingers.
We might end up with the first 16-core AM4 CPU being an unofficial 12 core, and getting back to the good old days of modding and overclocking, I'm crossing my fingers.
I think you’ll have to cross your fingers, toes, arms and legs, and still be out of luck. Wishful thinking sadly.