Donald Trump

hominid · 27 Dec 2019 at 19:20

Dis86 said:
The stuff you've written there has nothing to do with the conversation at hand.

If you had quoted the rest of the sentence that you omitted it was actually what I was talking about

hominid said:
The political elite are used to having their noses so far in the trough, most of them are at it, and here comes an outsider that has absolutely nothing on him except he used to like sex with beautiful women - and paid them handsomely for it.

I was talking about paying for sex/prostitution so keep it straight..

Werewolf · 27 Dec 2019 at 19:49

xander_uk2 said:
It's the Democrats version of Benghazi.

Well except that umpteen Benghazi investigations over years found that Clinton had done nothing incorrect, and iirc had actually done more in terms of security than the previous (Bush) administration...

Whilst in Trump land it seems that half his close associates (known collectively as the "tea boys") have been not only charged but found guilty of various crimes, many of which were directly related to Trump's actions.

Dis86 · 27 Dec 2019 at 19:54

hominid said:
If you had quoted the rest of the sentence that you omitted it was actually what I was talking about

I was talking about paying for sex/prostitution so keep it straight..

Right...but the point I made was you said he'd done nothing wrong - the evidence behind his impeachment suggests otherwise. You've just gone on a random rant about him also being a sexual predator. That isn't what this thread is about. Keep it straight.

hominid · 27 Dec 2019 at 20:20

Dis86 said:
Right...but the point I made was you said he'd done nothing wrong - the evidence behind his impeachment suggests otherwise. You've just gone on a random rant about him also being a sexual predator. That isn't what this thread is about. Keep it straight.

Again, no, that's NOT what I said.... You are trying, BADLY, to twist my words again - try to keep up..

I didn't say he hasn't done anything wrong, just that what the Democrats have him up on is rubbish.

Also again, he hasn't yet been impeached - yet! Pelosy hasn't given it to the Senate yet, the vote was along party lines so as long as you have a majority you can impeach with no real evidence. The Senate is Republican, so next to no chance it's getting through.The 'leaker' was an ex Biden Staffer so nothing political in that.. Pelosy did have a Son that worked for a Ukraine gas company, just like Biden, nothing wrong with that of course..

He is not a sexual preditor, if you want a president who is look at Bill Clinton - there are multiple women that have come forward about him. The women that Trump got with could all have said no, both to the sex and to the money(and they all signed NDA's iirc), but they took it like he knew they would. Liking to have sex with women doesn't mean you are a sexual predator, it's not something that I would ever do but I can admit prostitutes may be useful to some.

What you should be asking is 'why the hold up Nancy'? She knows there isn't a chance that it'll happen, that's why..

Dis86 · 27 Dec 2019 at 20:31

hominid said:
Again, no, that's NOT what I said.... You are trying, BADLY, to twist my words again - try to keep up..

I didn't say he hasn't done anything wrong, just that what the Democrats have him up on is rubbish.

Also again, he hasn't yet been impeached - yet! Pelosy hasn't given it to the Senate yet, the vote was along party lines so as long as you have a majority you can impeach with no real evidence. The Senate is Republican, so next to no chance it's getting through.The 'leaker' was an ex Biden Staffer so nothing political in that.. Pelosy did have a Son that worked for a Ukraine gas company, just like Biden, nothing wrong with that of course..

He is not a sexual preditor, if you want a president who is look at Bill Clinton - there are multiple women that have come forward about him. The women that Trump got with could all have said no, both to the sex and to the money(and they all signed NDA's iirc), but they took it like he knew they would. Liking to have sex with women doesn't mean you are a sexual predator, it's not something that I would ever do but I can admit prostitutes may be useful to some.

What you should be asking is 'why the hold up Nancy'? She knows there isn't a chance that it'll happen, that's why..

Um...he has been impeached. Lol.

hominid · 27 Dec 2019 at 20:37

Dis86 said:
Um...he has been impeached. Lol.

No, he hasn't! Until Pelosy sends the 'Articles of impeachment' to the Senate Trump hasn't been impeached - look it up.

The Constitution doesn’t say how fast the articles must go to the Senate. Some modest delay is not inconsistent with the Constitution, or how both chambers usually work.

But an indefinite delay would pose a serious problem. Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial.

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.

neckbeardthethird · 27 Dec 2019 at 20:38

Dis86 said:
Um...he has been impeached. Lol.

He's presumably referring to the technicality that until Pelosi sends off the articles of impeachment he's not actually been impeached. It's a bit of a pointless argument though given they will almost certainly be sent at some point.

Dis86 · 27 Dec 2019 at 20:39

neckbeardthethird said:
He's presumably referring to the technicality that until Pelosi sends off the articles of impeachment he's not actually been impeached. It's a bit of a redundant arguement given they will almost certainly be sent at some point.

And yet for all intents and purposes he has because the vote has been passed and as you say it's simply a technicality.

wesimmo · 27 Dec 2019 at 20:42

hominid said:
No, he hasn't! Until Pelosy sends the 'Articles of impeachment' to the Senate Trump hasn't been impeached - look it up.

Can you educate yourself on how to spell Pelosi, it's bad enough having to read your brain vomit, at least spell things correctly while offering to educate someone.

hominid · 27 Dec 2019 at 20:52

Dis86 said:
And yet for all intents and purposes he has because the vote has been passed and as you say it's simply a technicality.

That's not how the law works, you just can't pick and chose what to follow and what you ignore - or are you a Democrat?

hominid · 27 Dec 2019 at 20:52

wesimmo said:
Can you educate yourself on how to spell Pelosi, it's bad enough having to read your brain vomit, at least spell things correctly while offering to educate someone.

nope

Dis86 · 27 Dec 2019 at 20:53

hominid said:
That's not how the law works, you just can't pick and chose what to follow and what you ignore - or are you a Democrat?

Get over it. The vote has been passed and now it's just a case of filling in the forms!

hominid · 27 Dec 2019 at 20:56

neckbeardthethird said:
He's presumably referring to the technicality that until Pelosi sends off the articles of impeachment he's not actually been impeached. It's a bit of a pointless argument though given they will almost certainly be sent at some point.

The Senate is republican controlled, so fat chance it's going any further than that.

hominid · 27 Dec 2019 at 20:56

Dis86 said:
Get over it. The vote has been passed and now it's just a case of filling in the forms!

You know there are two house, Congress and Senate?

chroniclard · 27 Dec 2019 at 20:58

hominid said:
The Senate is republican controlled, so fat chance it's going any further than that.

Highlighting the complete corruption of partisan US politics.

neckbeardthethird · 27 Dec 2019 at 21:01

hominid said:
The Senate is republican controlled, so fat chance it's going any further than that.

This was pointed out like 20 pages ago dude, you're about a week late to the party and just repeating stuff which has already been discussed in detail.

Dis86 · 27 Dec 2019 at 21:03

hominid said:
You know there are two house, Congress and Senate?

Yes...And the vote to impeach him has already been passed. The vote to remove him has not.

hominid · 27 Dec 2019 at 21:06

Dis86 said:
Yes...And the vote to impeach him has already been passed. The vote to remove him has not.

How do you think that will go in a Republican controlled Senate? One that has witnessed first hand the shenanigans the the Dems in congress just pulled.

hominid · 27 Dec 2019 at 21:07

neckbeardthethird said:
This was pointed out like 20 pages ago dude, you're about a week late to the party and just repeating stuff which has already been discussed in detail.

No need for you to be here then, I wasn't here then but I'm here now.

Dis86 · 27 Dec 2019 at 21:11

hominid said:
How do you think that will go in a Republican controlled Senate? One that has witnessed first hand the shenanigans the the Dems in congress just pulled.

Again that's not what you said. You implied the two houses have to approve his impeachment. They don't. It's done.