@jsmoke it's saying I can't send you a PM but I did send you a trust message yesterday
@Rotty it's just allowed me to reply to jsmoke
unfortunately, definitely not the guy I appreciate all the help though
So to get this clear, they've been able to show from the cctv that the majority of the bodily harm was caused by one of the guys who couldn't be ID'd? So he's definitely a good candidate for GBH, but the guy they did ID only did enough (on tape) such that they could get away with affray?
If they all arrived and disappeared together as you said, and are then obviously all known to one another, it's ridiculous that the ID'd guys are allowed to keep schtum about the **** who did the most of it and get a reduced charge based on a plea.
I think the big problem is moral-less, money-grabbing, career-furthering, selfish ***** I mean lawyers
It's not about what you know it's about what you can prove.
Prove they all know each other and it wasn't randoms sharing a cab?
Could have been an uber drive share for instance.
Prove it wasn't.
There was a famous case in Glasgow where a gangster shot someone in Broad daylight hundreds of witnesses. None of them showed up. Everyone knew who done it including the police. He walked away scot free.
So prove they know each other. If they say they don't then nothing the police can do.
That from American gods?
Thanks