Or troll off.
That would be preferable.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Or troll off.
I'd like to think AMD's answer to DLSS is actually putting enough CUs onto the die so they can render the bloody image properly instead of relying on upscaling to boost frame ratesDLSS - Waiting to see what AMD use (possibly MS DirectML?)
If that's a photo of an RDNA2 card its fugly as sin. Can't AMD design a pretty and cool running card? AIB manufacturers have been showing them how to for years.
If I knew for sure that was coming out before hopper/Arcturus I would get 16gb minimum. But I doubt it will. Lol.Star Citizen.
I'd like to think AMD's answer to DLSS is actually putting enough CUs onto the die so they can render the bloody image properly instead of relying on upscaling to boost frame rates![]()
Oy Vey.......nvidia fanboys. Evil huang said during his kitchen table unveil of Ampere that he DOUBLED UP everything for Ampere. So the claimed cuda cores are -
RTX-3070 = 5888 cuda cores (but in reality is likely 2,944 cuda cores). RTX-2070 = 2304cc (2070 super = 2560cc).
RTX-3080 = 8704 cuda cores (but in reality is likely 4,352 cuda cores). RTX-2080 = 2944cc (2080 super = 3072cc and the 2080Ti = 4352cc).
RTX-3090 = 10496 cuda cores (but in reality is likely 5,248 cuda cores). For comparison, the RTX-Titan-X has 4608cc.
Bearing in mind top dog 'big Navi' has 80CU's (5120 Stream Processors), I think big Navi is not out of the race. Compare this with the RTX-Titan-X which has 4608cc.
I think evil huang is doing some major BS'ing and if he is lying through his teeth about something as basic as cuda core count on the 3070, 3080 and 3090, then I bet he's also greatly embellishing about their performance in gaming.
Something's messed up somewhere.
The 2080 was faster before? ...and the vram hasn't changed for either card.
I'd like to think AMD's answer to DLSS is actually putting enough CUs onto the die so they can render the bloody image properly instead of relying on upscaling to boost frame rates![]()
I don't believe many of those YT have the first clue about anything they speak about. I certainly don't believe they have any inside info.That or coreteks is spouting nonsense for clicks and if it's true he can say "see I told you so" and if it's not he can say "well it's leaks so you take it with a grain of salt"![]()
Wow. So you think AMD GPUs are going to surpass Nvidia's GPUs in rasterisation and actually equal the framerates of an NVIDIA equivalent DLSS 2.0 enhanced image??
Now I think people are dreaming.![]()
![]()
Shouldn't you be working on your CV to send to AMD? You seem to have all the answers..
ere we go.
Not looking at another derailment are we ?
I never said that at all, and you know it. Stop baiting, it's childish.Wow. So you think AMD GPUs are going to surpass Nvidia's GPUs in rasterisation and actually equal the framerates of an NVIDIA equivalent DLSS 2.0 enhanced image??
So if it's that hard for you, why don't you give yourself a break and just not follow this launch? Toddle along now.I have the answers. No one in their right mind will sell RTX 3090 performance at RTX 3070 pricing levels.
It's just that I know AMD and their intentions to super charge because they are "the premium" brand.
The Radeon brand doesn't cost a cent right now.
Always false and fake promises, as with Vega 64, Polaris that was going to be around GF *80 levels but was around GTX 1060 3/6GB :Laugh: