• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Navi 23 ‘NVIDIA Killer’ GPU Rumored to Support Hardware Ray Tracing, Coming Next Year

Status
Not open for further replies.
humbug said:
I certainly think RTX 2080 +80% for the RTX 3080 is very selective absolute best case, this is where Nvidia's marketing department builds too much hype and not for the first time, the RTX 2000 series was also massively over hyped performance by Nvidia.

The 2080 ended up being little better than the 1080TI, remember that?
Click to expand...


I can't find a resource where NVIDIA ever overhyped the 2080 to be that or even superior to the 1080ti.

Since the 2080 was released, it was pretty much a 1080ti equivalent card, which was an excellent card which AMD still haven't matched properly outside of the short lived Radeon VII.
 
I'm glad to finally get a performance leak of some kind. It would be something to consider if I were thinking about the 3070.

Many of us are considering the 3080 though, and they get released in less than a week. Maybe AMD will leak something that's relevant to that....before the 17th might be a good idea.
 
Fair play to them, they milked it for a while. Who do you blame though, nvidia for taking the cream, or the punters for queuing up and shouting "take my money!"?
 
Rroff said:
Not very though he had/has videos covering most angles - he claimed a bunch of new feature technologies that at best are tenuously similar to actual new tech in Ampere, his initial claim was his reliable source apparently claimed TSMC 7nm would be used for the 3080/3090 (I can't remember what produce numbers he used but basically pointing at those tiers) and Samsung 8nm for the lower end cards, then that changed to TSMC 7nm through the stack then eventually Samsung 8nm, etc.

EDIT: His "full" leak and IMO what he should be judged on as it presents some degree of exclusivity whereas the later information that is more correct is posted after the fact when other reliable sources have covered it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCPufeQmFJk

Top end GA102 card would be 220w, 2.2GHz clock, 864GB/s memory bandwidth, 5376 cores, built on TSMC 7nm, come with DLSS 3.0.

I'll leave the audience to decide.
Click to expand...

The only leaks I believe are the ones that come from Rogame, Kopite7kimi or KittyCorgi or Twitter. Between them they pretty much got everything spot on. Including the 2x FP32 :P
 
Twinz said:
I'm glad to finally get a performance leak of some kind. It would be something to consider if I were thinking about the 3070.

Many of us are considering the 3080 though, and they get released in less than a week. Maybe AMD will leak something that's relevant to that....before the 17th might be a good idea.
Click to expand...

I'll be honest, I think that's why nVidia pushed the review embargo back to the 16th. If reviews dropped on the 14th that would have given AMD firm numbers to drop an announcement/leak on 15th/16th that showed big navi beating them. However likely you think the scenario might be, pushing the embargo back to 16th shuts the door for any possible AMD marketing before release on 17th.

Edit: Obviously AMD could make a blind announcement without firm nVidia numbers - but it's more of a gamble for them.
 
https://wccftech.com/amd-next-gen-radeon-rx-6000-series-rdna-2-graphics-cards-benchmarks-leak/
Ayyyythis better This lil Navi ??
AMD-Radeon-RX-6000-Series-RDNA-2-Graphics-Card_Alleged-Benchmarks_1.jpg
 
thenewoc said:
He's got one of them awful accents that drones on too much like a lot of americans, seems like they need their nasal passages bored out. Not as bad as Gamer Meld though, that's toe curling bad.
Click to expand...

Plus he talks so fast that all his words blur together into a muttering jumble. He occasionally has something worth watching but mostly he just bashes something for the sake of uploading a video.

Brett from UFDTech is even worse. His clickbait titles are an absolute joke and his videos drag on but say nothing.

Jay is in love with Nvidia. Nothing else to say. :P
 
Satchfanuk said:
Can't have the punters knowing what they're buying before they splash the cash, that would be sheer madness :p
Click to expand...

They still have over 24 hours to check out all the reviews before they've even allowed to spend money. I don't think it's anything as sinister as what you're suggesting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom