I agree it would probably be around 5% faster but it would be pretty close. But my point is how much more can AMD offer top and how realistic is it that they can close that additional gap to a 3080?
If they have an 80CU part at 2.2Ghz I fail to see how it couldn't match a 3080 to be honest, with IPC improvements etc that are expected.
If the top end is 64CU at 2.3-2.4Ghz then It would likely fall about 5-10% slower than a 3080 in my opinion.
I just fail to see a scenario where AMD are not at least reasonably close to a 3080 in terms of raw raster perf but you never know, they might completely drop the ball.
Agreed. 80 CU Big Navi is all but officially confirmed at this point and i can't see how its not at least as fast as a 3080.