............and you know its "bovine excrement" how exactly?
Has it been investigated by any criminal agencies? Has the laptop been forensically examined and the results published by anyone? Have you personally seen the laptop?
As the answer to all these questions is NO then how the hell do you justify making a statement calling it bull-crap when YOU, along with the rest of us, have zero idea what's really on it and if it's genuine or not or are you only calling if bull-crap because you don't like that it might (or might not) change the result of a US election for someone you may not like?
If you've paid any attention to the story you'll know that IIRC
The laptop was allegedly dropped off at a random computer store a couple of thousand miles from where he lived.
The Laptop is a macbook where the default is that it pushes you to encrypt it - and it wasn't.
There was a hard drive dropped off with it that has a warranty that suggests it was made AFTER it was dropped off if you go by the timeline that is being spouted.
The computer is in the hands of the FBI, no it's not in the hands of the FBI
The computer had child porn on it - yet the people who handled it made copies of it depending on which version of Rudy's story time you listen to (you would have to be thick as anything to do that given that means you're now up for a charge of possessing, distributing and making child porn) and the FBI haven't acted on the latop (they wouldn't leave it as child porn normally gets a fast response as it's an easy prosecution and opens the door for a really deep look into anything else).
Then you get to the Tucker Carson stuff where you've:
Got a package of vital paper documents that have been sent via courier (without making any copies*) and has been intercepted and the contents removed.
The package has been found with the USB drive in it (wait weren't they paper documents? and had already been delivered opened?)
The whole thing should be dropped as it's not important.
Then you've got the attempt to make the fact that Hunter Biden had another laptop seized when a therapist of his was arrested a big thing, despite the fact that the FBI handed it back once they knew it didn't belong to the the person they were after.
The story has more holes than a colander, to the point where the first paper offered it said "not a chance" after doing some very basic checks and IIRC the second one couldn't get any of it's normal staff to agree to put their names on it.
*Yes really, it's routine for experienced "journalists" to send the only copies of vitally important documents via mail as opposed to you know making copies of it.
