There is no “trans lobby”, just a tiny fraction of nut jobs with a loud voice.
Most trans people realise that having a penis is not something someone straight looking through date a woman is willing to deal with, and are ok with this.
Super Straight - a new sexuality???
- Thread starter dowie
- Start date
There is no “trans lobby”, just a tiny fraction of nut jobs with a loud voice.
Most trans people realise that having a penis is not something someone straight looking through date a woman is willing to deal with, and are ok with this.
A 'tiny' amount of people with a loud voice pretty much defines most lobbying groups
And what’s a tiny amount within a tiny amount? Particularly when they are actively rejected by trans people as their spokespersons.
Or are you the kind that thinks all Muslims are ISIS?
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 7,172
You said there was no such thing as a 'trans lobby' and then went onto describe the group to sound exactly like a lobby.
Calling them a lobby doesn't mean they represent all people that may fall within the purview of what they are apparently lobbying for.
But they claim to be championing 'trans rights' so it's entirely appropriate to call them a trans lobby just as it would be appropriate to call a 'tiny' miniority of people loudly advocating for Sharia an Islamic lobby group even if not all Muslims would support the introduction of Sharia universally.
In terms of trans people I'm not convinced that the trans lobby does, internally, comprise of a 'tiny minority either.
They may be a statistically tiny part of the overall population but internally I think there is quite a large contingent of AGP's exercising their narcissistic tendencies by demanding society must bend to their particular paraphillia
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 13,659
- Location
- La France
Nope, I do as well. Much more of a U.K. thing than saying that word to mean gearbox which I release is a Yankism.
Genuine laugh out loud from me, that was great.That's brilliant
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 7,172
Dominic Frisby has a few funny songs on his channel, 17 million **** **** was my favourite, the hate speech one was funny tooThat's brilliant
What's the sexuality of someone who only like the opposite sex (man - woman / woman - man) and only of the same race? (black - black / white / white)
Super duper straight?
Personally I like women of all races and have been in relationships with black / mixed and differing religions. However I have friends who only like women of their race and friends who like women who are not thier race. e.g. White friends who only like white women, white friend only like asian women, black friend only likes white women
Super duper straight?
Personally I like women of all races and have been in relationships with black / mixed and differing religions. However I have friends who only like women of their race and friends who like women who are not thier race. e.g. White friends who only like white women, white friend only like asian women, black friend only likes white women
Loved that, thanksEspecially when Gary sings along with "bop,bop,bop,bop,bop,bop,bop"
straight
I’m in the same boat, though to be fair my opinion is offensive now and likely to always be!!
Oh yea, tis one I remember well.
@TrannyBill - this is all your fault!!
Someone I know insisted this whole thing was inherently transphobic! They were adamant that because some trans people can pass then, provided they've transitioned/are taking hormones then straight men fancy *all* women and just have some bigotry or issue to get over when they find out there is peen involved.
Essentially his argument is that you can fancy someone, fall in love with them and (traditionally) even marry them before you actually get them into bed and naked - which is true.
His "proof" was to show some images of trans people and see if you can tell which are trans or not, rate which are more attractive etc...
He thought this was checkmate.... that he had some brilliant argument.
He didn't - I'd already accepted that some trans women could pass, especially when coated in makeup and you're only seeing a still photo and you could have an initial attraction to them without knowing... (realistically though, in real life and seeing them talk, the size of their hands, their shoulders etc.. even if they pass well in a photo most of them won't pass well, in reality, but meh..) he then insisted again that this was all that mattered.
So I said I reckon we can do a similar test - plenty of girls can look older without makeup - if I show you a bunch of pictures of females you need to rank them in terms of attractiveness, if you pick the underage girls then by your own logic, you're a paedophile!
He got angry - supposedly that isn't the same, yet it's the same logic - clearly, the initial attraction isn't all that matters here - once the makeup is removed and other factors considered then that can change things considerably - straight men tend to want (developed) females, not male trans women with penises and fake boobs or females that aren't quite there yet but have stuffed tissues into their bra and coated themselves in makeup etc..
There aren't any existing sexualities defined by race AFAIK
Essentially his argument is that you can fancy someone, fall in love with them and (traditionally) even marry them before you actually get them into bed and naked - which is true.
His "proof" was to show some images of trans people and see if you can tell which are trans or not, rate which are more attractive etc...
He thought this was checkmate.... that he had some brilliant argument.
He didn't - I'd already accepted that some trans women could pass, especially when coated in makeup and you're only seeing a still photo and you could have an initial attraction to them without knowing... (realistically though, in real life and seeing them talk, the size of their hands, their shoulders etc.. even if they pass well in a photo most of them won't pass well, in reality, but meh..) he then insisted again that this was all that mattered.
So I said I reckon we can do a similar test - plenty of girls can look older without makeup - if I show you a bunch of pictures of females you need to rank them in terms of attractiveness, if you pick the underage girls then by your own logic, you're a paedophile!
He got angry - supposedly that isn't the same, yet it's the same logic - clearly, the initial attraction isn't all that matters here - once the makeup is removed and other factors considered then that can change things considerably - straight men tend to want (developed) females, not male trans women with penises and fake boobs or females that aren't quite there yet but have stuffed tissues into their bra and coated themselves in makeup etc..
There aren't any existing sexualities defined by race AFAIK
Would explain the obsession some posters have in here with other peoples genitals.
Didn't you kb a mtf woman? What about her did you not like?
Is it phobic for people to rule out dating a trans person - for the sole reason that they do not consider a trans person to be the sex they identify as - from a sexual partner point of view?