Isn't this diagram incomplete, shouldn't there be more permutations like a man that only fancies trans women and stuff like that? I jest but I do actually have an acquaintance who shacked up with a trans model, and has spent a lot of time in Thailand...
Super Straight - a new sexuality???
- Thread starter dowie
- Start date
What's transphobic about criticising the exact same thing you just criticised yourself?
I think you vastly underestimate this ideology re: not having any power - just look at the court case earlier today re: the ONS and the census or look at what has happened in the US with women's sports etc.. or just in general in the west with access to women's spaces etc..
AFAIK that is considered "problematic" and fetishising them or something.
I think you are buying into media hype and are worried/scared about something that will never affect you.
You just do you, and let other people get on with what ever they want to get on with.
Thanks for that armchair Freud, if you don't want to discuss the topic then go post in one of the other many threads on here.
You haven't addressed the point though - why is it transphobic to make the same criticism you've made? Is that an admission that you're a transphobe and you think others are if they put across similar criticism?
You seem to be keen on projection but not very good at putting forth a coherent point, rather you just descend into almost comical rants.
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 9,691
- Location
- North
it genuinely isn’t though, outliers. I’m on a gaming forum called resetera (used to be neogaf) which is essentially a trans safe place and probably the biggest gaming forum, it’s crazy. Literally saying you wouldn’t date trans women is a bannable offence. The line feels like it’s getting pushed forward on a weekly basis.
it has to stop
I got banned from a discord channel/booted out of a gaming clan because I said tranny. Was on there for a good year too. Not a nice thing tbh.
He never does address points or actually post any facts. He rants and raves about what is no more than his opinion and gets ever more unstable when countered with actual facts. Then he gets violent and aggressive.
Me having a preference for who and what I’m attracted to is very much not the same as the transphobic bile spouted itt.
I don't know how old you are but "tranny" was often shouted as an insult in the 90s at cross dressers so maybe thats why
so was the full word as well though pretty much
Maybe one of the older members of the clan got triggered, these days I'd imagine they can walk down a street without being insulted but they also make a lot more effort now.
the 90s and earlier must have been a pretty terrible time for them
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 13,049
- Location
- La France
Is it still okay to describe a vehicle’s gearbox as a “tranny” or do I have to say ratiofluid device now?
Oh aren’t you soooo clever
So you can't answer - you quote my post referring to "you transphobes" but you're seemingly unable to substantiate the claim - go ahead, quote where I've posted some transphobic bile?
But that IS transphobic, according to the trans lobby. It is like lesbians being called transphobic because they won't go with a pre-op transgender woman.
I agree that the extreme elements get the attention and so we end up debating small minority situations. But history as shown us already that if these issues arent debated they will be waved through.
What is more sad is these extreme elements say to transgender people its not good enough for you to be a transgender woman until you're accepted as a cis woman. So until the entire society accepts this thought then the same representatives that say they support transgender people have set up a situation that is unlikely to happen and so for the trans community will feel perpetually insecure.
in the UK if you say tranny when referring to a gearbox will people even get what you mean? I thought in the UK it means the whole drive system and I don't think I ever heard any UK people calling it a transmission anyway
do you drive a The-hair-cull ?
What is all this talk of "woman penis"
I thought the penis is a male sex organ used to inseminate females. Why would a straight man want to to suck a woman penis, to stimulate it so he could later be inseminated?
Sure, a woman can have a strap on but that wont be very useful in the whole insemination process. A real penis on a woman is not a thing, its just a real penis on a male who may want to look like a woman.
Am i just being too logical here??
I thought the penis is a male sex organ used to inseminate females. Why would a straight man want to to suck a woman penis, to stimulate it so he could later be inseminated?
Sure, a woman can have a strap on but that wont be very useful in the whole insemination process. A real penis on a woman is not a thing, its just a real penis on a male who may want to look like a woman.
Am i just being too logical here??
Soldato
- Joined
- 9 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 5,336
- Location
- Bristol
At 44 I'm so glad I'm old and don't have to grow up amid all this confusion.
I just keep my mouth shut because my own opinion, whatever that is, might be acceptable one moment and offensive a short time later.
I just keep my mouth shut because my own opinion, whatever that is, might be acceptable one moment and offensive a short time later.
It's a logical conclusion from a false premise, namely that a person's sex has nothing to do with their physiology. It builds on and is related to the equally false premise that sex and gender are the same thing.
Remember that reality is what The Party says it is. Think what The Party tells you to think, even if it's different to what they told you to think earlier. We have always been at war with Eastasia.
A lot of so called 'progressive' movements and statements are particularly laced with internal contradictions.
For example
A group of people that have themselves taken part in propagating an ever expanding list of supposed sexualities and gender identities, whilst also demanding that other people must abide by whatever pronouns they decide to use and must jettison biology as they do so, get annoyed that another group have, in tern, decide to adopt a new label for themselves.
Or the social media pronouncements from individuals, companies, charities and activist groups that say that ' trans women's are women.... which always raises the obvious reply 'so what actually is a woman?'
If a reply is ever provided the response is always a load of gender wang nonsense that essentially boils down to circular definitions and/ or saying that being a woman is a feeling which usually seems to comprise of complying with a rather regressive set of gender stereotypes that may be somewhat associated with the sexes of people in many cases but don't define them.
I think the next movement should be a concentrated movement of better renumerated men declaring themselves to be lesbian women who eschew contemporary feminine dress and makeup instead preffeing to wear 'masculine' clothing.
They would therefore, in practice, not need to change anything about themselves apart from how they 'identify' whilst simultaneously doing their bit to eliminate or indeed reverse the 'gender pay gap'.
Any opposition to their self declared identity would, like the 'super' movement, just lay bare the problems with the other sides ideology.
This would not doubt result in some great moment's to revel in schadenfreude as so called progressives are left with their cogs whirring as they try to manage the epic levels of cognitive dissonance that lie between calling out obvious ridiculousness and their own deeply held beliefs that are built on the very tenets that have enabled the afermentioned ridiculousness.
For example
A group of people that have themselves taken part in propagating an ever expanding list of supposed sexualities and gender identities, whilst also demanding that other people must abide by whatever pronouns they decide to use and must jettison biology as they do so, get annoyed that another group have, in tern, decide to adopt a new label for themselves.
Or the social media pronouncements from individuals, companies, charities and activist groups that say that ' trans women's are women.... which always raises the obvious reply 'so what actually is a woman?'
If a reply is ever provided the response is always a load of gender wang nonsense that essentially boils down to circular definitions and/ or saying that being a woman is a feeling which usually seems to comprise of complying with a rather regressive set of gender stereotypes that may be somewhat associated with the sexes of people in many cases but don't define them.
I think the next movement should be a concentrated movement of better renumerated men declaring themselves to be lesbian women who eschew contemporary feminine dress and makeup instead preffeing to wear 'masculine' clothing.
They would therefore, in practice, not need to change anything about themselves apart from how they 'identify' whilst simultaneously doing their bit to eliminate or indeed reverse the 'gender pay gap'.
Any opposition to their self declared identity would, like the 'super' movement, just lay bare the problems with the other sides ideology.
This would not doubt result in some great moment's to revel in schadenfreude as so called progressives are left with their cogs whirring as they try to manage the epic levels of cognitive dissonance that lie between calling out obvious ridiculousness and their own deeply held beliefs that are built on the very tenets that have enabled the afermentioned ridiculousness.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 8,102
Anyone else remember tranny as short for transistor radio? Ok, just me then