Sadly we both know that either Russia or China will veto - the UN in its current form is a waste of resources
Lock them in the toilets and hold the vote

Sadly we both know that either Russia or China will veto - the UN in its current form is a waste of resources
One thing I was wondering was why didnt more civilians not escape it was days until Russia reached some of these places?
I appreciate it a very difficult task but it when you see convoys of buses late on you wonder where was that at the start.
Allow UN discussion.
Come to no conclusion.
But UN votes to send peacekeeping force and enforce no fly zone, made up of NATO member countries under UN banner
I know it won't happen.
Unless surrendering by treaty, they are still enemy combatants occupying another country. Germany still strafed retreating troops at Dunkirk.What signals a lie is the purity. That absolutely now Russian involvement occurred and that russia military are perfect. Well if we know the latter is a load of tosh. Then it's only a matter of QED.
Is it me or is Putin attempting to stop “retreating/withdrawing” troops from being slaughtered? Only then to redeploy them elsewhere? Also attempting to use the UN to gold only his own annexed Ukrainian land?
I suspect Ukrainians want to teach putin a lesson he will not forget. Ukrainian farmers and land owners will not want putin invalidating their right and giving the land to russian farmers.
If Russia has said that they will be limiting its "special operation" to the East then they shouldn't have an objection to a no fly zone over the West.
If they have any intention of doing it then now is the time, before a new push from the East starts
Sadly there will be some that will believe the lies from Russia
Absolutely disgusting, they have no shame and no morals, the Kremlin is a house of psychopaths.
They know a an awful lot about injuries, blood and length of death for a group that left before any of that happened, strange that.
Playing devils advocate here, are you actually able to refute those allegations?
You’re volunteering the UK to give up its veto?Sadly we both know that either Russia or China will veto - the UN in its current form is a waste of resources
Playing devils advocate here, are you actually able to refute those allegations?
*German Govt Spokesperson, on Further Sanctions vs Russia, - Will Agree Further Measures in Coming Days*German Economy Minister Habeck: Germany Is Working on Reducing Reliance on Russian Energy.
*German Economy Minister Habeck: The EU Clearly Has More Room for Further Sanctions on Russia.
*German Economy Minister Habeck: If Gas Is Not Avaliable, We Will Need to Return to Coal.
I mean it's coming from a country that said they're not invading ukraine, have invaded, committed those crimes and now are saying it wasn't us? they've been lying constantly, why would you trust them now?Playing devils advocate here, are you actually able to refute those allegations?
I mean, god forbid, but if you came home to find someone had broken in and you found your family murdered... it'd take a 'brave' defense council to turn to around to the jury and say, 'well, they may have done it to make my client look bad!'Playing devils advocate here, are you actually able to refute those allegations?
This is quite compelling. Unless NATO is worried about Ukrainian friendly fire, I can't think of any reason not to do this whilst the time is opportune.
It would put the ball back in Putin's court, where the prospect of venturing West would mean willingly engaging NATO. Something he won't do, so this is a solid move in my opinion.
So you're wanting NATO planes to shoot down Russian planes if they go into West Ukraine? If we did that then why would Russia not feel able to attack NATO air bases launching those air patrols with cruise missiles? Then if they did that, Russia has launched an attack on a NATO member state invoking article 5, so suddenly NATO is at war with Russia. You're happy with that outcome?
So you're wanting NATO planes to shoot down Russian planes if they go into West Ukraine? If we did that then why would Russia not feel able to attack NATO air bases launching those air patrols with cruise missiles? Then if they did that, Russia has launched an attack on a NATO member state invoking article 5, so suddenly NATO is at war with Russia. You're happy with that outcome? NATO in a total war state with Russia, both nuclear armed powers, potentially escalating into a strategic nuclear exchange leading to the deaths of 1 billion people according to a US study, in defense of a non-NATO member in Ukraine who are currently pushing back Russia and have held Kyiv simply with our support
So you're wanting NATO planes to shoot down Russian planes if they go into West Ukraine?
If we did that then why would Russia not feel able to attack NATO air bases launching those air patrols with cruise missiles? Then if they did that, Russia has launched an attack on a NATO member state invoking article 5, so suddenly NATO is at war with Russia. You're happy with that outcome? NATO in a total war state with Russia, both nuclear armed powers, potentially escalating into a strategic nuclear exchange leading to the deaths of 1 billion people according to a US study, in defense of a non-NATO member in Ukraine who are currently pushing back Russia and have held Kyiv simply with our support