CPUZ Benchmark (all welcome)

[storm-chaser]

That score is absolutely nutty

The CPU speed only says 5400MHz, but I suspect it is much higher than that. Because we've benchmarked many other 12900Ks in this test and nothing in the 5.4GHz "realm" comes even close.

 

[Nickolp1974]

The CPU speed only says 5400MHz, but I suspect it is much higher than that. Because we've benchmarked many other 12900Ks in this test and nothing in the 5.4GHz "realm" comes even close.

see post #180 single core speed 5400 and multi 5100 this is on regular 12900k, KS arrives tomorrow

 

[storm-chaser]

see post #180 single core speed 5400 and multi 5100 this is on regular 12900k, KS arrives tomorrow

Just for reference purposes here is my 9600KF running AVX with a moderate "spring" OC. lol

 

[Nickolp1974]

Just for reference purposes here is my 9600KF running AVX with a moderate "spring" OC. lol

Nice boost from your original, no need to wait for the weather now!!!

 

[ChocAndGray]

Hold on, I didn't realise the 12900k's scored higher than the 5950x in multi too?

As someone that really resents going AMD I wish the 12th gen intel had been out sooner

 

[storm-chaser]

Nice boost from your original, no need to wait for the weather now!!!

But can these scores be translated accurately from earlier versions?

 

[Nickolp1974]

But can these scores be translated accurately from earlier versions?

not comparable to be honest but neither are the Epic and threadripper cpu's!! you could add a separate avx box or just state original bench only. Still need a 5950X user to compare @MadMatty @kitfit1

 

[storm-chaser]

not comparable to be honest but neither are the Epic and threadripper cpu's!! you could add a separate avx box or just state original bench only. Still need a 5950X user to compare @MadMatty @kitfit1

Wonder how my 36 core Xeons are going to compare with your results.

 

[kitfit1]

not comparable to be honest but neither are the Epic and threadripper cpu's!! you could add a separate avx box or just state original bench only. Still need a 5950X user to compare @MadMatty @kitfit1

 

[ChocAndGray]

What on earth have you done to get that score.

I thought I was doing well with 690 single and 13512 multi.

What frequency are you hitting on the single and multi? Must be 5.3ghz and 4.9ish?

edit: ah you're testing in a different benchmark

I just ran mine on single and got:

 

[kitfit1]

What on earth have you done to get that score.

I thought I was doing well with 690 single and 13512 multi.

What frequency are you hitting on the single and multi? Must be 5.3ghz and 4.9ish?

edit: ah you're testing in a different benchmark

I just ran mine on single and got:

As you can see now, i did nothing other than run the bench

 

[ChocAndGray]

As you can see now, i did nothing other than run the bench

Yeah apologies I jumped the gun and was thinking those were figures on the default benchmark which would have been ridiculously high

Intel cpu's are still some way ahead though.

 

[turbot1984]

this is great, I can fool myself that I am at Alder Lake speed

 

[Nickolp1974]

Thanks Graham Defo seems to favour ADL with the AVX version

 

[Firegod]

cpuz 2.0 you can use avx, i'd like to see a ryzen result to compare

My 5800X with AVX2 gets 778 single and 7546 on multi. If it helps. So just a tad less than your 1248 single and 14380 multi. lol.

 

[Nickolp1974]

My 5800X with AVX2 gets 778 single and 7546 on multi. If it helps. So just a tad less than your 1248 single and 14380 multi. lol.

 

[RSR]

Intel i9 12900KS

Version 17.01



Version 19.01 (AVX2)



CPU-Z 2.01 seemed to give a lower score on this, so scores may vary on this test with 2.01.0

 

[storm-chaser]

HP Z840 with two Xeon E5-2696 v3 processors 36c/72t, liquid cooled, liquid metal thermal paste (Ill try with 19.01 a bit later)

 

[storm-chaser]

19.01

 

[storm-chaser]