Well I said in another thread that the West should be doing more to support Ukraine, and that was met with cries of 'don't poke the bear' and 'you don't challenge a country with nuclear arms'.
So which is it?
So first off, I made my opinion very clear. Saying "someone else once had a different opinion" is a nonsense argument. Personally I think we should have sent troops to Ukraine before this even started - just like the US did with Georgia and stopped Putin in his tracks from trying to take the whole of Georgia.
Watching Ukraine get decimated whilst other countries sit at the sidelines cheering them on isn't really helping them.
I agree, I think we should have done more to help and should still be doing more, we should be sending them an artillery piece for every man and woman who wants one, not 72, thousands.
We shouldn't be drip feeding them $800m a week, it should be $10bn now. In the long run it will save the world a lot more cost. We should be sending F16's, MIGs, hinds, everything we have that could help. They don't have a manpower issue, they have training camps where they have 20 men waiting and 1 gun available. Sending additional troops with no equipment actually wouldn't help them at all.
It'd be akin to China declaring war on the UK and us trying to fend off an attack from them, assuming nuclear weapons weren't involved, we'd fail miserably, but you're suggesting everyone fights to the death and watches the country turn to oblivion in the name of honour and valour? That wouldn't be very smart and the government at the time would likely concede defeat in the interest of the safety of the citizens.
You're assuming the Russians would have been less brutal if Ukraine rolled over at the first instance, and in terms of deaths with the first couple of months you may be correct, but longer term the costs to YOUR family might still be terrible. It's also somewhat unlikely as Ukraine have already been fighting Russia in Donbas since 2014, so there would still have been a lot of "reprisals".
I personally would rather my country fight even if that means my death, rather than live a lifetime under a brutal dictator where I could end up dead anyway at any moment.
But to be honest, if you're the sort of person who can argue against Russia's invasion one minute and then be spewing pro Russian nonsense the next, then at least I know I can safely ignore anything else you post.
I mean you are actually arguing that we shouldn't have stood up to Hitler. Putin is now every bit as bad as he was, it's the exact same thing and I find it incredibly frustrating that we've even let him get this far.
The "oh but he's got nukes" argument is rubbish. Several of his ex advisers know exactly full well that he wouldn't use them as it's a self imposed death sentence the second you launch them.