Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,454
Seems a pretty poor use of resources to demolish a building
Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar
- Thread starter areksnumbr1sxylady
- Start date
- Status
Seems a pretty poor use of resources to demolish a building
I have done, it says Russia paid to have NATO troops killed, so go on, expand .
Well why didn't you prove me wrong with evidence?
If I'm wrong I'll hold my hands up, or we could got nah nah your wrong all day if you like?
Yeah the worlds largest or second largest nuclear power who's missiles will all be targeted at NATO countries and in particular the US are seen as no problem?
They moved troops out of Europe yes but most of NATO and US nuclear weapons will be squarely targeting Russia still, not China, China are doing things differently up to now and don't threaten the world with nuclear war whenever someone stands up to them
The US could probably wipe out China in a first strike scenario, not so with Russia.
You really hate the US don't you?
I think he forgets that Kaliningrad is in the middle of East European nato.
[Apr 30 2022, 17:39:56 BST]: Ukrainian Military: Russian Air Force Has Continued to Launch Air Strikes on City of Mariupol, Focusing on Azovstal Steel Plant
[Apr 30 2022, 17:41:56 BST]: Ukrainian Military: Our Forces Have Regained Control Over Four Settlements in Kharkiv Region
[Apr 30 2022, 17:41:56 BST]: Ukrainian Military: Our Forces Have Regained Control Over Four Settlements in Kharkiv Region
Last edited:
Soldato
I said they see them as more a European problem, not no problem.
Every large scale exercise I've been involved in with the US military has been heavily based on defending/defeating Chinese forces. The rhetoric not if, but when.
Evidence of something not happening?
Like anal probing by Aliens. The big lie, or wmd.
The POTUS saying is was bs.
The low confidence is the truthfulness.
Go Google. I’ll link but you won’t be arsed. Try the BBC.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,454
No idea what this weapon is/was, not long range and slow, very potent for sure.
Ð Ñбежное Ñайон РХÐТ
ÐÑименение в боевÑÑ ÑÑловиÑÑ ÑамоÑодной ÑеакÑивной ÑÑÑановки ÑазминиÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð£Ð 77 «ÐеÑеоÑиÑ»youtu.be
What , Russia paying for NATO troops to be killed?https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ny...politics/russia-afghanistan-bounties.amp.html
Soldato
And, apparently, another one bites the dust.
Mobilising barely trained reserves and new conscripts will take months, so I believe that they would just push them out green with even worse equipment which makes them a liability not a boon. If they do in fact take the time to do it sensibly they have the near term problem of emerging Ukrainian counter offensives which could make mobilisation completely pointless.
The lack of vehicles is going to start becoming a rather critical problem as well.
The lack of vehicles is going to start becoming a rather critical problem as well.
Soldato
If that is true morale on the Russian side must be in the toilet.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,454
It's really quite amazing when you think about it that Putin has had 8 years to plan this, yet it's been done like a plan on the back of a packet of cigs, everything that's being done is in all the wrong order and he still has yet to get Russians into believing it's a fight worth fighting
Soldato
I think if there is an eventual cessation of hostilities and Russia is forced to rebuild their military from scratch and Ukraine maintains most of their current territory then China would want no piece of a fight with NATO. Putin and the Chinese leadership are Apples and Oranges.
- Status