Look at the date of that Reuters article, notice anything?
It was planned already? Strategic planning at work. I don't think the war was a last minute objective.. a simple over sizing ahead of time and a pipeline can have the capacity easily.
Look at the date of that Reuters article, notice anything?
So it might be ready by 2024, that's not really going to help the Russian finances much in the next year and a half or so, and that's assuming they can manage to finish it in time, what with all the sanctions meaning that an awful of the specialist equipment needed to build the pipeline is likely going to be in short supply for Russia as there tend to be a limited number of companies that make it (and they'll likely not be supplying it via china either if it's for a Russian project).They do not have the pipeline to China built yet but the estimated date is sometime in 2024.
https://www.ft.com/content/f0080bf6-5e7d-44be-871f-a5d44dccf5c5
Russia has agreed a 30-year contract to supply gas to China through this new pipeline.
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-...as-deal-using-new-pipeline-source-2022-02-04/
Again confirming that the Americans are gathering intelligence and sharing this with Ukraine in regards to targets, giving credence to Russias claims.
The deal was agreed 3 weeks before the invasion. Since then Russia has been crippled by sanctions and now they no longer have access to the tools and technologies to build out a pipe like that (in all likelihood a western company like BP or Shell would have been leading the construction). The Chinese could build it but I'm not sure they would want to invest all that capital into a country that's as untrustworthy as Russia besides it would break international sanctions which would backfire on them.It was planned already? Strategic planning at work. I don't think the war was a last minute objective.. a simple over sizing ahead of time and a pipeline can have the capacity easily.
A Russian force of up to 150,000 soldiers is still not enough for all that the Kremlin wants in Ukraine.
Experts believe that Russia made the strategic mistake of dispersing its limited strike force across several axes in Ukraine instead of just one. It had to give up on Kyiv and northern Ukraine and in not withdrawing from the south, Russia was forced to commit a lot of military power at the expense of its offensives in Donbas.
"And thus they fall short of the strength to get 100% results," said Andriy Zagorodniuk, a former Ukrainian defense minister and currently the head of the Kyiv-based Center for Defense Strategies.
![]()
Battle to end the war: Ukraine's chance to get edge over Russia
The third phase of Russia's war on Ukraine is coming. The first, the Kremlin's brazen blitzkrieg in late February that culminated in the Battle of Kyiv, failed. The months-long Battle of Donbas in Ukraine’s east making up the second phase has gotten bogged down, with Russia having barely enoughkyivindependent.com
So it might be ready by 2024, that's not really going to help the Russian finances much in the next year and a half or so, and that's assuming they can manage to finish it in time, what with all the sanctions meaning that an awful of the specialist equipment needed to build the pipeline is likely going to be in short supply for Russia as there tend to be a limited number of companies that make it (and they'll likely not be supplying it via china either if it's for a Russian project).
Ultimately Russia seems to have been under the impression they could replay Crimea with the Ukrainians putting down their weapons etc. so didn't expect to need large forces. A large part of why they withdrew from the north was likely the realisation the ~37K troops they'd committed there were hopelessly inadequate to siege a city like Kyiv against an adequate defence. (To put it in comparison in WW2 Germany used half a million soldiers to encircle Kyiv and those numbers are still relevant today in the kind of warfare going on in Ukraine).
Zelensky wants everyone to keep giving aid so Ukraine can keep fighting but for how long, neither us or the Americans are pushing for peace.
Russia has done the west a favour really while crippling itself. All very long term of course, less fossil fuel, technology benefits from war, NATO a good kick up the backside. Quite incredible tbh.
A war over nothing![]()
Because of bravery like this pensioner, the Russians ran with their tails tucked. Using a scavenged RPG and some hand me down hand grenades, he was able to stop a Russian column dead in its tracks from passing through his village and he then alerted the ukraine military who proceeded to lay down artillery to the road to clean up
Belarus has been pretty quiet lately... where's the invasion at poopashenka?
and started undressing infront of the old man haha.
There’ll be peace when the Russians get the hell out of Ukraine. The Russians version of peace is occupying Ukraine and killing the population. That isn’t peace. The west will continue to arm Ukraine until Russia is pushed out and then we’ll arm them even more to keep Russia out, along with the rest of NATO.
The medium explains, quoting a dermatologist, that the bacteria themselves begin to eat the acids that give off the bad smell if one has not bathed for a long time. In this way, the “self-cleaning process” starts, allowing you to simply pour water over the body without using the soap. In the event that this method does not seem very comfortable, only the feet, armpits, buttocks and groin can be lathered, advises the newspaper.
In the midst of the energy crisis that the European country is going through, Habeck has repeatedly advocated in favor of saving energy, well closing the curtains from homes at night, commuting by bike and train instead of using cars, as well as “controlling” the bathing process. For his part, the German Minister of Agriculture, Cem Özdemir, called on his fellow citizens to eat less meatwhich, according to what he declared, “would be a contribution against [Vladímir] Putin”.