‘Absolute evil’: inside the Russian prison camp where dozens of Ukrainians burned to death
Entrepreneur Anna Vorosheva accuses Moscow of murder after spending 100 days in the Olenivka detention centre
www.theguardian.com
Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar
- Thread starter areksnumbr1sxylady
- Start date
- Status
www.theguardian.com
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 16,020
- Location
- Fareham
I was confused when it said antiradiation, but reading some more they mean anti radar.
Some rumours that they may have some f-16s
Some rumours that they may have some f-16s
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jan 2010
- Posts
- 3,912
Late to the party here.
How many people here actually read the Amnesty report?
I did, it seemed reasonably well researched and written. I can't see the findings would have been that surprising to anyone.
How many people here actually read the Amnesty report?
I did, it seemed reasonably well researched and written. I can't see the findings would have been that surprising to anyone.
Soldato
- Joined
- 10 Sep 2003
- Posts
- 5,020
- Location
- Midlands
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 16,020
- Location
- Fareham
Yes but also some chatter that those missiles and f-16s make more sense than those missiles being fitted to older non NATO planes.
Nothing confirmed of course.
Nothing confirmed of course.
As I hoped they would do, the Russians started trying to repair the bridge and had machinery sitting on the bridge, it's these machines and supplies that are on fire
But a week ago, the Russians also stationed some of their reflector mirror "defences" near the bridge to make missiles and rockets miss their target. Guess it didn't work
But a week ago, the Russians also stationed some of their reflector mirror "defences" near the bridge to make missiles and rockets miss their target. Guess it didn't work
Nah do they mean antiradiation, it's not just radar but other sources of electromagnetic radiation which can be targeted by them too.
F-16s sound like the least plausible explanation here tbh.. though post the link if you still have it available.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 16,020
- Location
- Fareham
Pinch of salt with any info, but people talking about theories in this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/ukraine/comments/wiifv2/ukraine_began_to_use_american_agm88_harm/
I did NOT read it. Which is why I have barely commented on it. I'm more interested in the war rather than getting side track with this stuff.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 10,265
- Location
- Billericay, UK
I'm getting tired of hearing how one particular weapon system is a "game changer". We've had this with the M777's, NLAW's/Javelins, Bayraktars, HIMARS and now HARM. None of these weapons single handed win you a war but a combination of all them working together in coordination combined with sensible tactics and trained soldiers.
Without some of the light anti-armour/anti-air weapons Ukraine likely would have lost large parts of the country by now - it has enabled the territorial and national guard forces, etc. to be combat effective against heavier equipped Russia/Russian backed units with tanks, etc. rather than them only being seriously challenged when coming up against regular Ukraine army forces.
Likewise some of the bigger drones have given Ukraine an intel edge they'd have otherwise lacked - it isn't necessarily a game changer in terms of winning, but a game changer in terms of not taking huge losses already.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 16,020
- Location
- Fareham
I don't think it's a game changer either, was just posting to the discussion thread on reddit.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 4,258
- Location
- North Sea
I wonder if they’ve knocked up something that can launch HARM’s from the ground, as they did with the Brimstone technicals that Ukraine have been using against Russian armour.
- Status