Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
How would western tanks fair against anti tank weapons Ukraine is using to blow up Russian tanks?

Early in the war Russia had a habit of re-making all the mistakes from early WW2 with their tank use - often sending armoured columns unsupported into bottlenecks making it all too easy for the Ukrainian forces, they've tightened that up a bit now but are still using tanks in isolation quite often for "recon by combat" kind of manoeuvrers which are highly exposed to Ukrainian special forces and mines, etc.

A lot ultimately depends on the quality of the tank commander and/or driver though - sure its Battlefield 4 but I wish I had some footage from some of the games I was riding as gunner on tanks with a good commander/driver - some had impeccable positioning, timing and awareness, etc. and could operate with an extraordinary long life expectancy in situations bristling with hostile anti-tank equipment that the average player would just get blown up in immediately (EDIT: That is something which comes from a mixture of innate skill and 100s of hours of experience - not something you get with people sent into war with barely 2 weeks of experience on the hardware they are operating and having maybe fired 1-3 real rounds against static targets :s).
 
Last edited:
Early in the war Russia had a habit of re-making all the mistakes from early WW2 with their tank use - often sending armoured columns unsupported into bottlenecks making it all too easy for the Ukrainian forces, they've tightened that up a bit now but are still using tanks in isolation quite often for "recon by combat" kind of manoeuvrers which are highly exposed to Ukrainian special forces and mines, etc.

A lot ultimately depends on the quality of the tank commander and/or driver though - sure its Battlefield 4 but I wish I had some footage from some of the games I was riding as gunner on tanks with a good commander/driver - some had impeccable positioning, timing and awareness, etc. and could operate with an extraordinary long life expectancy in situations bristling with hostile anti-tank equipment that the average player would just get blown up in immediately (EDIT: That is something which comes from a mixture of innate skill and 100s of hours of experience - not something you get with people sent into war with barely 2 weeks of experience on the hardware they are operating and having maybe fired 1-3 real rounds against static targets :s).
There was an interesting video about the Kharkiv offensive and how their tank commander was commanding remotely whilst watching a live drone feed. A big move away from their Soviet doctrine training.
 
Last edited:
RUSSIAN INVESTIGATIVE COMMITTEE HEAD: BLAST ON CRIMEA BRIDGE WAS PREPARED BY UKRAINIAN SPECIAL SERVICES

PUTIN DESCRIBES CRIMEA BRIDGE EXPLOSION AS ACT OF TERRORISM, SAYS UKRAINE WAS RESPONSIBLE
 
It's a possibility now, perfect way to justify anything to himself.

Doesn't really change anything. Whatever he wants to do he does it. Not really sure why he's bothering to play these games of "justifying" stuff. Just do what you're gonna do Putin.
 
Doesn't really change anything. Whatever he wants to do he does it. Not really sure why he's bothering to play these games of "justifying" stuff. Just do what you're gonna do Putin.

True, maybe just propoganda that he can try and sell to any Russians.
 
We can invade you but please don't be mean to us. Jokes.

Just read this has gone on 228 days now. Unbelievable really.
This far in Ukraine (or Russia if you like a conspiracy) is hitting within Russian territory.

I wonder if anyone thought this would be the state of play 228 days in!
 
I'm going with a thermobaric explosion, which is a blast overpressure explosion so the fuel ignition leaves lots of "fire" and thermal debris (the huge amount of sparks) in the air with a huge over-pressure area to kill people, yet virtually no shrapnel or a crater if it airbursts and those elements are all present in the videos of the bridge strike.

Next would be to figure out how a thermobaric device was delivered, we know they fit in the Russian Iskander-M SRBM so if Ukraine used it's Grom SRBM it'd be a new development for that missile. Outside of a Grom I have no idea how Ukraine could get a Thermobaric warhead of sufficient size onto the bridge. On the other hand I could be very wrong about it being thermobaric TBH.

Could the blast have originated on the train itself? I know zero about bombs, but as an engineer it looks like the bridge has suffered immense pressure from above the roadway, rather than a blast occurring below it. It would seem to be an obvious way to deliver a large payload onto the bridge's structure, to me.
 
Last edited:
Just read this has gone on 228 days now. Unbelievable really.
This far in Ukraine (or Russia if you like a conspiracy) is hitting within Russian territory.

I wonder if anyone thought this would be the state of play 228 days in!
I know I certainly didn't, I hoped they wouldn't get rolled over but it all felt very ominous.

I know the support has helped but the resolve and ingenuity of the Ukrainians has been, and is, inspiring.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom