Pentagon releases UFO footage

Has anything of any importance happened at these hearings yet?
Congress took a field trip to the military base to see the classified evidence first hand and said the evidence is real and is an unknown craft that doesn't match anything known in the US military. They also talked multiple times about how the UAP's used ECM against the military proving the UAP are craft of some sort not birds, balloons or other nonsense some posters on here like to pretend.

Due to the what they have seen some new UAP Laws was rushed out and passed in record time. A number of threats was made against the people hiding information was put into law. They put it into law that the contractors had to hand over the evidence within 180days. Whole bunch of other important stuff https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th...3/text#toc-idfd4035e5209e44529f3bbb8af6e2d9f8

Congress strongly suggested there is missing money being diverted from legal SAPs to illegal projects being run without oversight. The money audit failed for the 5th year in a row and Congress was not happy with the explanations.

They also said there has been a history of over classification by the Military and too much being kept hidden that needs to come out. They made threats to defund the people involved and other threats.
 
Last edited:
Are there any reports on the first part? Only time I’ve heard mention of that is when you’ve written it yourself. Not saying I don’t believe you, I’d just like to read some further information on it.

Interesting use of language tho as that makes it sound more like secretive development of new hardware rather than anything military. Hence why I’d like to read up on it.
 
Sounds like that scene from the Bourne films. They give a presentation to the clueless gov types and it gets swept under the carpet.

Is it illegal to run a secret program?
Well they are not clueless and its not being swept under the carpet. Matt served on the armed services committee for seven years and also had lots of experience with DARPA and Advanced Technologies for several years. Luna was a specialist in the U.S. Air Force and the others also have good backgrounds. These people are experienced, have good reputations and have no reason to lie and know all about military craft.

No its not illegal to run a secrete program as long as its funded correctly, on the books and with Congress oversight. That is not what is being talked about. The fact is the oversight community to a field trip to look at the evidence directly and said the evidence is real.
 
Are there any reports on the first part? Only time I’ve heard mention of that is when you’ve written it yourself. Not saying I don’t believe you, I’d just like to read some further information on it.

Interesting use of language tho as that makes it sound more like secretive development of new hardware rather than anything military. Hence why I’d like to read up on it.
https://www.fox13news.com/news/repu...fo-hearing-unlike-anything-any-government-has
Not found a direct link to Luna interview. This new channel has a video clip of her saying she has seen some of the evidence which she is trying to get declassified.

From Matt at the Congress briefing. This transcribe is not 100% perfect

"Matt Gaetz: ago, my office received a protected disclosure from Eglen Air Force Base indicating that there was a UAP incident that required my attention. I saw briefing regarding that episode and brought with me congressman, Birchett, and congresswoman Luna. We asked to see any of the evidence that had been taken by flight crew in this endeavor and to observe any radar signature, as long as, as well as to meet with the flight crew. We were not afforded access to all of the flight crew. And initially, we were not afforded access to images and to radar. Thereafter, we had, bit of a discussion about how authorities flow in the United States of America.

And we did see the image. And we did meet with one member of the flight crew who took the image. The image was of something that I am not able to attach to any human capability either from the United States or from any of our adversaries And I’m somewhat informed on the matter having served on the armed services committee for seven years, having served on the committee that oversees DARPA and Advanced Technologies for several years. When we spoke with the flight crew, and when he showed us the photo that he’d taken, I asked why the video wasn’t engaged.

Why we didn’t have a flir system that worked. Here’s what he said. They were out on a test mission that day over the Gulf of Mexico, And when you’re on a test mission, you’re supposed to have clear air space. Not supposed to be anything that shows up. And they saw a sequence of four craft in a clear diamond formation for which there is a radar sequence that I and I alone have observed in the United States Congress. One of the pilots goes to check out that Diamond formation and sees a large floating I can only describe as an orb, again, like I said, not of any human capability that I’m that I’m aware of. And when he approached, he said that his radar went down. He said that his flir system malfunctioned and that he had to manually take this image from one of the lenses, and it was not automatic automated, in collection, as you would typically see in a test mission. So, I guess I’ll start with Commander Frever. In well, how should we think about the fact that this craft that was approached by our pilot, had the capability of disarming a number of the sensor and collection systems on that craft."
 
Where are the other reports kept?
Not sure why you wanted this. Here is the data you asked for in an interactive map format: https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/uk-news/ufo-sightings-uk-north-east-27472229 its 2 years’ worth of data from 1 database. Which means there are a lot more sightings then just these.

Also Christopher K. Mellon Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence recently did an interview saying there is compelling evidence that he has seen first-hand from his job. To go along with all the other high ranking officials saying the same thing.
 
Last edited:
So this reads that they visited the airbase and have only been shown an image taken from a camera from the plane/pilots helmet? It also reads that they (two of the congressmen, one being the rather deplorable Gaetz, the other I don’t know) were only shown one image, and nothing else.

I think you’ll have a hard time convincing anybody that there’s a plethora of detailed evidence waiting to be released based off what these Congress people have said.
 
So this reads that they visited the airbase and have only been shown an image taken from a camera from the plane/pilots helmet? It also reads that they (two of the congressmen, one being the rather deplorable Gaetz, the other I don’t know) were only shown one image, and nothing else.

I think you’ll have a hard time convincing anybody that there’s a plethora of detailed evidence waiting to be released based off what these Congress people have said.
Matt got to see the radar sequence as well. The photo is from the camera pod something along the lines of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward-looking_infrared#/media/File:NAVFLIR_DAMOCLES_P1220870.jpg
 
Not sure why you wanted this. Here is the data you asked for in an interactive map format: https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/uk-news/ufo-sightings-uk-north-east-27472229 its 2 years’ worth of data from 1 database. Which means there are a lot more sightings then just these.

Also Christopher K. Mellon Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence recently did an interview saying there is compelling evidence that he has seen first-hand from his job. To go along with all the other high ranking officials saying the same thing.
Some examples :)

Redditch
Shape of UFO: Cylinder
Date spotted: 16/05/2022
Description: Cigar-shaped object glowing bright white with a green tinge. Shot to the left very fast and quickly lost from sight

Droitwich
Shape of UFO: Sphere
Date spotted: 14/12/2021
Description: Fast moving white sphere around 500ft high, travelling at approx 600-800mph

How do they submit these? No photo? Any extra evidence? No radar data?
 
If real evidence of some advanced technology does come out at the end of this then some folks on the thread are going to look like luddites.
 
Back
Top Bottom