COVID-19 (Coronavirus) discussion

This is very true but it was just considered normal all those years ago. People didn’t get sick pay so they had to work regardless of what was wrong with them.my father was old school, you got a job no matter what it was and worked at it. He got flu one year and as far as I remember he had about 2 or 3 days off work before he went back. He would also walk miles to a job if he didn't have a lift or bus fare.
That was in yonder days... in recent times people are expected to be more aware of things like this, especially in office environments. Knowingly (ie: you know you have one but still go to the office) spreading a cold (not to mention anything else) is really poor form and can really ruin peoples week/weekends.
 
That was in yonder days... in recent times people are expected to be more aware of things like this, especially in office environments. Knowingly (ie: you know you have one but still go to the office) spreading a cold (not to mention anything else) is really poor form and can really ruin peoples week/weekends.
I know but as I said a lot of workers don't get sick pay and so they have no real choice in the matter, yes covid has hi-lighted this in a big way.
You could also spread infection before you even realise you're bad.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
100%, I'd have a go at them and ask why they have come to work and if I ended up with their cold I'd let them know.
Pretty sure we've had multiple threads on this pre Covid about selfish people with colds.

Here's one from 2009 https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/t...-for-a-day-off-or-not.18062498/#post-15030319
You would have been an exception then, all I'm saying is precovid most people just accepted that others went into work with colds.
I had to go and see the Pharmacist at our surgery about my blood pressure, guess what he said when I got in the room with him, you got it, he had a cold but was still at work and in face to face situations without a mask.
 
I have been to work with colds. Only ring in sick if I am constantly coughing, sneezing or blowing nose. Or or struggling to keep head up.
I am an unlucky soul who is susceptible to colds. If I'd taken everyday everyday I'd been suffering with a cold off my employers would have put me through capability and booted me out. Home working and the new outlook following COVID means I can work those ill but not too ill days from home and bosses understand it.

As to vaxx thing, the entire family has been vaccinated apart from the kids. The balance of risks between Covid and the vaccination was too woolly and small to make it worth while for them.
 
Last edited:
I've been lucky in most of my jobs in that I didn't always work too close to others.

Well there you go, since 1974 I've worked on factories with people either side 3 foot away and from 2007 in the NHS with dozens in close proximity in an office.
People have never liked it when you pass on germs because it can effect how you work and your home life.
 
Well there you go, since 1974 I've worked on factories with people either side 3 foot away and from 2007 in the NHS with dozens in close proximity in an office.
People have never liked it when you pass on germs because it can effect how you work and your home life.
True, but my point is that it wasn't seen as that much of a problem before covid. Now having seen the effects of covid and how quickly it spread has given people a wake up call(some obviously will still go to work regardless).
 
I've worked quite a few different jobs over 25 years, only one of those actively encouraged people not to come into work with an infectious disease and several the sickness procedures leaned heavily against taking time off with a cold, etc. while sure people can be infectious with a cold/flu 1-3 days before symptoms or even fully symptomless, I've always found it utterly silly as in my experience a few simple precautions and people not coming in 99% of the time prevents it going around and when it goes around you usually get around 10 days of reduced performance and at least some people off sick enough to have a much larger disruptive effect than 1-2 people being off in the first place.

Obviously workplaces need to get a balance to it as well to prevent abuse, but mostly it seems old fashioned attitudes and short sighted thinking calling the shots rather than a reasoned approach.

As I've mentioned before I found it interesting where I work, during the peak of the pandemic we had fairly strict protocols, but nothing particularly arduous, compared to other similar businesses on the same estate/nearby and absolutely nothing went around during that time even when individuals came in with colds or COVID, while the other businesses had COVID go around 2-3 times, then when everything was relaxed stuff started going around at work again.
 
As an asthmatic, my employer have taken that into account when I have been off with colds, chest infections and covid. The first time I had covid, a few days before the first lockdown, my employer didn't count covid or been asked to self isolate towards sickness count. The second time, my employer reverted back to standard sickness policy about 7 weeks earlier.

In the winter 18/19, I had a chest infection and went into work and the coldness of the store aggravated an asthma attack.

I had a chest infection for 2.5 weeks between a few days before Christmas to early Jan and just happened that my bad days were on my days off. What helped me is now I am on my feet doing 90k-110k steps a week at work. Whereas before I was on the checkouts/kiosk and did about a third of the walking.
 
Gone completely quiet again COVID wise here, the person on my training course (not local location) seems to have had it as a couple of other people who were there have gone down with COVID but I'm guessing myself and the colleague who was with me have escaped it as we've not picked anything up.
 
In Germany, a 62 year old man accepted payments to get vaccinated for COVID in the place of people who didn't want the vaccine. He is estimated to have received 217 COVID vaccines over 29 months, although prosecutors were only able to confirm 130.

What happened to him? He's still alive and well. This study in The Lancet has the details.

Here, we report on a 62-year-old male hypervaccinated individual from Magdeburg, Germany (HIM), who deliberately and for private reasons received 217 vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 within a period of 29 months (figure A; appendix 1 tab 1).

...Throughout the entire hypervaccination schedule HIM did not report any vaccination-related side effects. From November 2019, to October 2023, 62 routine clinical chemistry parameters showed no abnormalities attributable to hypervaccination (appendix 1 tab 2).

Furthermore, HIM had no signs of a past SARS-CoV-2 infection, as indicated by repeatedly negative SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests, PCRs and nucleocapsid serology (figure A; appendix 1 tab 1).
 
The people who struggle with covid seem to have a genetic disposition to not producing enough of a certain type of antibodies.


I suspect this is why some people are getting vaccine induced long covid too.
 
In Germany, a 62 year old man accepted payments to get vaccinated for COVID in the place of people who didn't want the vaccine. He is estimated to have received 217 COVID vaccines over 29 months, although prosecutors were only able to confirm 130.

What happened to him? He's still alive and well. This study in The Lancet has the details.
guy must be the best 5g tower in the country
 
Gone completely quiet again COVID wise here, the person on my training course (not local location) seems to have had it as a couple of other people who were there have gone down with COVID but I'm guessing myself and the colleague who was with me have escaped it as we've not picked anything up.

Just had an update email for our Trust
71 Inpatients with Covid
10 Inpatients with Flu
 
Back
Top Bottom