Ah yeah, I did not that, brain fart375W is max with two 8 pins and the slot, 150W per 8 pin and 75W through the edge connector.

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Ah yeah, I did not that, brain fart375W is max with two 8 pins and the slot, 150W per 8 pin and 75W through the edge connector.
Was that ever in question? Both those GPUs are high end and AMD said ages ago they wouldn't be competing at that level.There would be no point upgrading from 7900 XT and certainly not from XTX.
Where did you see that? The last thing I seen was it was likely to fall between the 7900xt and the xtx.Hmmmmm with the new information just come out I cannot see the 9070xt being faster than 7900xt in raster closer to 7900gre.
It’s funny seeing the “AMD need to fight Nvidia” from people you know from their post history, only want it so they can get their Nvidia card cheaper.
“AMD need to fix their drivers”… at least theirs aren’t breaking GPUs
“AMD need to match Nvidia for features”… does that include melting GPUs due to poor power connector design?
I want AMD to be cheap as well but the same poster(s) only a few weeks ago were saying they were happy to purchase a 5080 at £1200 - £1400. Yet somehow it’s all on AMD to “bring the fight to Nvidia”.
The 5070Ti costs £800 to £1000 and is out of stock (most likely poor stock levels as per Nvidia’s plans). To be fair this is being called out. Yet here we are with people in AMD thread lamenting about AMD need to fight Nvidia and “if they charge £700 for this it’s a fail”.
Frankly the way things are if the 9070XT is trading blows with a 5070Ti for £750 or less it will fly off the shelves. I don’t like it but this is down to consumers… not Nvidia or AMD.
Hmmmmm with the new information just come out I cannot see the 9070xt being faster than 7900xt in raster closer to 7900gre.
Steve from HW unboxed thinks a 9070XT needs to be $550 if it matches the 5070ti to be a success.
I don't always agree with HW but in this case I think there right, they really need to undercut a good chunk and have stock at launch to get market shareSteve from HW unboxed thinks a 9070XT needs to be $550 if it matches the 5070ti to be a success.
AMD needs it to be priced at a level which is too good to refuse.I don't always agree with HW but in this case I think there right, they really need to undercut a good chunk and have stock at launch to get market share
Yeap no £50 cheaper ********, I'm sure FSR4 will be good but your still limited to only FSR3.1 games compared to years of DLSS2+ games that can be upgraded to newest .dll's and RT is gonna be interesting on how close they get to NvidiaAMD needs it to be priced at a level which is too good to refuse.
Thanks!You are right in general but i know @jonneymendoza , the person who wrote that, he's a good egg, he doesn't have altera motives like that![]()
The problem is, if it's legit £50 cheaper than the 5070ti msrp, that actually means it's £150-200+ cheaper in reality. This is the problem, msrp means damn all especially with nvidia.Yeap no £50 cheaper ********, I'm sure FSR4 will be good but your still limited to only FSR3.1 games compared to years of DLSS2+ games that can be upgraded to newest .dll's and RT is gonna be interesting on how close they get to Nvidia
Steve from HW unboxed thinks a 9070XT needs to be $550 if it matches the 5070ti to be a success.
I've only been watching HWU since the summer and I got that vibe myself, I wasn't sure if I was reading too much into it.That's preloading a bad review, he knows there is no way its going to be $300 less than its Nvidia competitor (in some instances half the price) he's setting unrealistic expectations because he doesn't want give it any positivity.
This petty bickering of his with AMD needs to stop.