But for some strange reason we (collectively) seem to think a CPU like the 5800X3D or 9700X at $450 and $360 respectively are not a lot of money despite them containing dies that are four times smaller than a GPU.
If paying £500 for a product that contains a 357 mm² die is a lot of money what is paying £315 for a product that contains a 70 mm² die, should a 9700X cost £80 or should a 9070 cost £1,200?
Don't get me wrong as i, like most people, think we're being asked to pay way too much for gaming GPUs. However i don't see that changing anytime soon for the simple fact that everyone and their dog now uses TSMC for cutting edge nodes and they have limited capacity so products with higher profit margins take priority.
As I said, the time will tell.
I won't pay £400 for a processor either. My current setup is getting old but still delivers majority of what I need
5600x - £200
CM 212 Turbo - £20
Tomahawk B450 Max II - £50
32GB Ballistix 3200@3600 - £80
2 x 4TB Samsung EVO - 2 x £120
1 x 500GB Crucial P5 - £36
Corsair RM650X - £78
NZXT 340 Source - £40
Samsung Odyssey G5 32'' - £170
all bought brand new, on offer, from the UK retailers, majority obviously a good while ago. if that need to serve me for another year or two, it's fine. All games I play at 1440p@75hz, still run with decent details and look good enough for me.
If I needed to change the platform now, I would still get decent setup for about £400 ( Ryzen 7 7700 from aliexpress + decent 650 motherboard + 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30)
I refuse to spend more than I am comfortable with, even though 2k isn't really a lot of money for me. I did it once with rtx 3070 (£580 for this cripple, selling Vega 56 for £350 made it a bit less bitter), I regret it, and I will never do it again.
I am casual gamer, work full time, I travel regularly, I have family, life and quite a few interests. I have PS5, XBOXX and can buy another console if necessary. If that's going to be my last gaming rig, be it.