Are you suggesting that this woman is likely to sexually assault either the therapist or her children?
Possibly, she does have an unhealthy interest in children she certainly does seem to indicate strong potential to be creepy around them... but beyond that we're talking about a procedure where the owner of the male genitals can frequently get aroused... granted they're not specifically giving them a hand job but having this pervert turn up at their home,.when they're alone with their kids and then get aroused etc.. is just weird and could easily be rather intimidating - I can't believe you're objecting to that objection tbh...
This side of your arguement is ridiculous, stats show that trans woman are far more likely to be the victim's of violence than the perpetrator, and nothing suggests this woman is any different in this regard.
sorry but in the words of mags "just LOL"
There is plenty to suggest that, unless you're of the opinion that this person is representative of trans people in general, which actually would perhaps explain/partly justify the violence! (I'd not personally blame a parent if they did end up battering this individual if she did what she's implied she'd perhaps do in girls changing rooms). Of course most trans people aren't actually like this wierdo.
That said, if the procedure she requires necessitates specialist training the therapist she approached does not have then that specialist is well within their rights to refuse. Indeed to continue with a treatment they're unqualified to undertake could be dangerous and would almost certainly leave them open to charges of negligence if it went wrong, ending their career at best. If it were something like nail painting I'd support this woman if the therapist refused to treat her, but in this case, where the treatment is to a sensitive area and involves a treatment the therapist is not trained in then I have to say I agree that the therapist was probably right to refuse.
I think they're right to refuse regardless, yes that is a valid objection but given the area do you not think that consent is important too?
Like suppose the beauty school they go to trains them in both, they're qualified in both - do you not agree that they can just state they're not comfortable providing this procedure to people who possess male genetalia? (I mean it is a different procedure even so essentially they'd just be saying they don't offer "brozillians" or whatever else they're called.)
