Shave my balls, bigot!

(Yaniv is one of thoose people who simultaneously claims to be trans and gay conviently leaving them sexually attracted to women whilst still retaining their male genetalia).....
Who likes taking selfies in the female toilets, talking about female sanitary products and want a topless over 12's pool party (no parents allowed)


A topless youth pool party for LGBT and allies for people aged 12-24... WTF??? So they wanted to have some guys and girls in their 20s at a party with topless underaged girls and no parents/guardians allowed... best not oppose it though or you're 'phobic.

This gets weirder and weirder, turns out the trans person is seriously odd beyond the activism/shaving of balls - apparently to confuse matters even more she kept a male name and picture on social media when contacting these salon owners, seems to have harassed them and has seemingly managed to get some to settle with her as they didn't want to go to court. Also seems to have a thing for sanitary products and young girls! This person seems like a full on nonce, doesn't seem to like immigrants either!

This literally seems to be the "mythical" trans predator that various TERFs have been worried about with regards to wanting to exclude trans people from women's prisons, women refuges etc..etc..

https://www.thepostmillennial.com/the-truth-about-jessica-yaniv-is-beginning-to-emerge/

edit - have put the screen prints of her tweets/messages in spoiler tags as people might not want to have them on the screen at work etc...

lmmcAyK.png

5diQzMl.jpg

:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:
:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:
 
Last edited:
Problem is Vince we can talk about the context but that isn't how the law works.

The law has to make rather more universal proscriprions.

So you have to consider what you are potentially compelling people to do when you enact a law.

Actually, the law (at least in our country) almost always takes in to account context otherwise we might as well just make Police the CPS, judge and jury as well.

Which is why you get cases like this: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-48554239
 
Actually, the law (at least in our country) almost always takes in to account context otherwise we might as well just make Police the CPS, judge and jury as well.

Which is why you get cases like this: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-48554239


Sorry Vince you are clueless here...

Sally Challen didn't get her murder conviction reduced to manslaughter because of the sort of context you might suggest but because the appeal heard evidence that she was suffering from an undisclosed mental health issue at the time of the murder which allowed her to use the partial defence against murder based on this which if successful reduces the murder charge to a manslaughter one.

( by the way this wasn't about a defence of coercive control as the media incorrectly reported)

Sally Challen's appeal used the wording of the law itself it didn't rely on some further reading of the 'context'


CPS said:
Partial Defences to Murder
Partial defences, are different to complete defences, such as self-defence, as they bear all the ingredients of murder but if successfully argued, reduce the offence to an act of voluntary manslaughter not murder. They are: diminished responsibility, loss of control and killing in pursuance of a suicide pact.

This is explicitly written into law and does not apply some nebulous application of the context.

Partial defence to murder: diminished responsibility
52Persons suffering from diminished responsibility (England and Wales)
(1)In section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957 (c. 11) (persons suffering from diminished responsibility), for subsection (1) substitute—

“(1)A person (“D”) who kills or is a party to the killing of another is not to be convicted of murder if D was suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning which—

(a)arose from a recognised medical condition,

(b)substantially impaired D's ability to do one or more of the things mentioned in subsection (1A), and

(c)provides an explanation for D's acts and omissions in doing or being a party to the killing.

(1A)Those things are—

(a)to understand the nature of D's conduct;

(b)to form a rational judgment;

(c)to exercise self-control.

(1B)For the purposes of subsection (1)(c), an abnormality of mental functioning provides an explanation for D's conduct if it causes, or is a significant contributory factor in causing, D to carry out that conduct.”

(2)In section 6 of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 (c. 84) (evidence by prosecution of insanity or diminished responsibility), in paragraph (b) for “mind” substitute “ mental functioning ”.
 
I heard about this story from Lindsay Shepherd, who got banned from twitter for responding to tweets when this person attacked her. She made a video that goes in to more detail about the person.

 
This literally seems to be the "mythical" trans predator that various TERFs have been worried about with regards to wanting to exclude trans people from women's prisons, women refuges etc..etc..

This stuff has been a matter of public knowledge for well over a year now. Kiwi Farms has an entire thread on it dating back to 2018. He's a serial harasser who launches frivolous lawsuits at the drop of a hat:

brazilian-wax-complaint-1.jpg


LOL that he claims to get periods, and use tampons. He doesn't even have the necessary plumbing!
 
Seconding that motion. That's quite the keeper.

fake e: Caracus2k going at this thread full on like someone called him a Marxist. Marvellous :D


I'm glad to see that you apparently find low income immigrant women being harrassed by men with the help from the law something to be made light of.
 
Last edited:
So - Shortened version of story

Some weirdy internet bottom dweller has decided to become a "transgender woman" (with no operation) so he can visit women, in their own homes and get his balls shaved. If/when they refuse he gets in to a huff and tries to make money from suing them. The women are predominately migrants, and he/she has previously shown Trump levels of racism towards migrants.

He also is trying to use this transgender status to perv on women.

Not massively dissimilar from this person really: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...ho-sexually-assaulted-inmates-jailed-for-life
 
Back
Top Bottom