Soldato
I think they will beat a 2080Ti but not by much. Then nvidia will release a 3080 and comfortably beat it. If it doesnt then theres bound to be a backup Titan to spoil the party.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Only one thing is certain, these new big Navi cards will put the RX 690 sorry I mean the RX5700 firmly back into the midrange sector where it should have been all along.
Well it is by definition mid-range by today's standards although I'd say mid to high range is more appropriate. There are three or four faster cards and the definition of mid range performance has to move up with time when there are faster cards.Very close to 1080Ti performance for ~£360 isn't exactly bad and not what I would call mid range performance.
Well it is by definition mid-range by today's standards although I'd say mid to high range is more appropriate. There are three or four faster cards and the definition of mid range performance has to move up with time when there are faster cards.
Analysis: Big Navi and Next-Gen Consoles
Analysis: Big Navi and Next-Gen Consoles
1600Mhz + 12% = 1808Mhz: 2560 Shaders + 12% = 2867 Shaders: 2867 Shaders @ 1600Mhz = 9.2 TFlops
9.2 TFlops + 30% = 11.96 TFlops: 2867 Shaders + 30% = 3727 Shaders.
I'm going to stick my neck on the line and predict the XBox-X GPU is a 60 CU GPU (3840 Shaders) running at around ~1600Mhz.
To confirm: 3840 Shaders X 1600Mhz = 6,144,000 X 2 Flops per Cycle FP32 = 12,288,000 (12.29 TFlops)
Well it is by definition mid-range by today's standards although I'd say mid to high range is more appropriate. There are three or four faster cards and the definition of mid range performance has to move up with time when there are faster cards.
I would expect a mid range card to have the performance of a high end card from 3 years ago. As Nvidia up there pricing AMD added £100 to pricing of there RX580 replacement, if the cards sell at that higher price for both camps then its good business. Its why i hoping a 3rd player ie Intel could stir up competition properly.
It literally mean's I throw my money at nVidia's next release.
Did I read this wrong? If AMD pull rabbit out of the hat and actually produce a good card, you will be buying nvidia's offering instead?
I think they will beat a 2080Ti but not by much. Then nvidia will release a 3080 and comfortably beat it. If it doesnt then theres bound to be a backup Titan to spoil the party.
Can you imagine the price of that titan though. £2.5k incoming!
The Titans already £2.5k.
The Titans already £2.5k.
Very close to 1080Ti performance for ~£360 isn't exactly bad and not what I would call mid range performance.
Did I read this wrong? If AMD pull rabbit out of the hat and actually produce a good card, you will be buying nvidia's offering instead?
Yes.... Why ?
Well you have to think how much money AMD spent in R&D to literally catch up the last 3/4 years and overtake. These things will cost a lot of money, right up there with 2080Ti costs. Yes nVidia will still be more, but I believe they will still have the fastest cards.
So basically If I want to buy nVidia worth buying, i need AMD to pull this 'rabbit out of the hat'
Out of interest, what if AMD have the faster card?
Out of interest do you think they will? I dont.