Evidently in the stewards' view, he was entitled to turn in where he did as Hamilton was not fully alongside him. They will say that Hamilton should have seen that the move wasn't on, got out of it and waited for another opportunity. Same goes for the clash with Massa I would suspect.
I think Brundle has it right. Every time things go wrong for Hamilton recently it has to be someone else at fault. It can never be him being too aggressive, never be just sheer bad luck. It always has to be someone working against him. Where's the Lewis Hamilton that used to be brimming with self confidence, and took the odd bad day in his stride? These days it seems like his ego and mindset are as fragile as a McLaren rear wing under assault from a Torro Rosso....
Brundle has won nothing, Hamilton has won a title, Vettel, Alonso, Schumy, all of them had the same mentality as Hamilton, so Brundle is showing what a clueless idiot he is saying he's got the wrong mentality. Its those who constantly question what they do and end up backing out of chances who never win anything.
I really do need to see the Maldanado one again but the Massa one, Hamilton made the move and Massa reacted, after it was too late for Hamilton to move. Had massa been tight to the curve and already deep in, thats one thing, thats what Di Resta did. But Massa was way on the outside, behind Webber and left a huge space then only closed it after Hamilton had put his nose into it. I don't think Massa should be punished there but Hamilton certainly shouldn't have been.
Schumacher did that to Hamilton, and Hamilton didn't go, opps I'll just smash us together, Schumacher got to apoint Hamilton couldn't actually block him without contact and he got past. Schumacher did that to Rossberg aswell and it happened elsewhere on the track, Hamilton back on Schumacher who once Hamilton got the nose in, gave him space.
When Schumacher does what Massa did, turn in too late and cause a crash or pushes someone off the track everyones up in arms.
