Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

humbug · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:38

dml3 said:
AMD is a joke of a company.

1. They said at GDC they would be at Computex.
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/43945/amd-unveil-next-gen-radeon-r9-390x-computex-june/index.html

That came from KitGurur speculating, not AMD. we will know tomorrow or the day after...

ICEx21 · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:38

dml3 said:
AMD is a joke of a company.

These guys are done. Id rather see Intel get into the Card market right now and let AMD die off like they should have years ago

Put down the Prozac son, you seem to be taking this as a personal insult.

LoadsaMoney · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:39

Rofl

Svack · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:41

As far as I know, they only thing we know is that AMD have a press conference tomorrow!
http://www.amdcomputex.com.tw/

humbug · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:41

TaKeN said:
I don't see any evidence in there where AMD officially announced what they'd be doing.

As per usual, most of the stuff is made up by clickbait websites, then spread around forums.

EDIT - Beaten to it by the poster above

They are all feeding eachother, you have to read right to the end to see where their information came from, you go there are read on only to find they got it else where...... and so it goes on and on and on....

Vince · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:43

dml3 said:
These guys are done. Id rather see Intel get into the Card market right now and let AMD die off like they should have years ago

Because Intel has a brilliant history when it comes to discreet GPU's - Perhaps you haven't been around long enough to remember Intels larrabee, it was the future they said, discreet graphics from the worlds largest silicon producer. So what happened? here is a link for you to read:

http://www.vrworld.com/2009/10/12/an-inconvenient-truth-intel-larrabee-story-revealed/

Ayahuasca · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:44

Intel focused on the iGPU instead and their new one is actually very good.

LoadsaMoney · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:45

I really hope it isn't the 2900 all over again

Martini1991 · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:46

Vince said:
Because Intel has a brilliant history when it comes to discreet GPU's - Perhaps you haven't been around long enough to remember Intels larrabee, it was the future they said, discreet graphics from the worlds largest silicon producer. So what happened? here is a link for you to read:

http://www.vrworld.com/2009/10/12/an-inconvenient-truth-intel-larrabee-story-revealed/

They ended up changing what Larabee was or something ultimately.

Intel have just smashed AMD's APU's IGP performance.

Avenged7Fold · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:47

dml3 said:
AMD is a joke of a company.

1. They said at GDC they would be at Computex.
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/43945/amd-unveil-next-gen-radeon-r9-390x-computex-june/index.html

2. 980TI comes out right at Computex and AMD is no where to be found. They suddenly dont have the card at Computex

3. Now it's their own event in even more weeks.

These guys are done. Id rather see Intel get into the Card market right now and let AMD die off like they should have years ago

This is a joke of a post

1.You said AMD said that they would be at Computex but wasn't
2. Point 2 is still part of point 1 so i dont really get why it deserves to be on point 2.
3. Now it's their own event coming up, as they have planned and announced and you are angry that it hasn't come sooner.

This guy is done, i'd rather see Lambchop here foaming at the mouth spitting hate in my face than another tantrum post about AMD not bringing out a card sooner.

Boomstick777 · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:48

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X will be the watercooled, HBM-based flagship card

World exclusive: Up until this point, most people have presumed that AMD would be launching the Radeon R9 390X as its upcoming flagship video card, but we have just had an anonymous source tell us that this is wrong.

Read more at http://www.tweaktown.com/news/45602...atercooled-hbm-based-flagship-card/index.html

Read more at http://www.tweaktown.com/news/45602...atercooled-hbm-based-flagship-card/index.html

Vince · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:48

Ayahuasca said:
Intel focused on the iGPU instead and their new one is actually very good.

Is it? Compared to what? I have the HD4600 in a laptop alongside a nvidia gtx... The Intel card is only good for one thing and that is increasing the battery life. Sorry but it really isn't that good at all.

Ayahuasca · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:50

Vince said:
Is it? Compared to what? I have the HD4600 in a laptop alongside a nvidia gtx... The Intel card is only good for one thing and that is increasing the battery life. Sorry but it really isn't that good at all.

Not talking about the HD4600.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-5775c-i5-5675c-broadwell,4169-6.html

Martini1991 · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:51

Vince said:
Is it? Compared to what? I have the HD4600 in a laptop alongside a nvidia gtx... The Intel card is only good for one thing and that is increasing the battery life. Sorry but it really isn't that good at all.

The HD4600 isn't the latest, not since like 2 years, and it's good compared to every single IGP solution in consumer devices, because they've got the highest performing part

?

humbug · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:52

Martini1991 said:
They ended up changing what Larabee was or something ultimately.

Intel have just smashed AMD's APU's IGP performance.

Are you talking about Iris-Pro? that GPU is bigger than a 7870 / 270X @ 22nn vs 28nm and its not even that much faster than the A10's iGPU being half the size, that iGPU is also bottlenecked by system RAM.

Irs-Pro is still miles behind considering the vast size of it relative to performance.

AMD are about to put HBM on APU's and that will be a game changer.

Freddie1980 · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:53

Martini1991 said:
They ended up changing what Larabee was or something ultimately.

Intel have just smashed AMD's APU's IGP performance.

Yeah I've just seen the Toms Hardware Broadwell review, fricking scary stuff if you work for AMD. Just think how far ahead Intel would be if they actually put some effect into their drivers.

humbug said:
Are you talking about Iris-Pro? that GPU is bigger than a 7870 / 270X @ 22nn vs 28nm and its not even that much faster than the A10's iGPU being half the size, that iGPU is also bottlenecked by system RAM.

Irs-Pro is still miles behind considering the vast size of it relative to performance.

AMD are about to put HBM on APU's and that will be a game changer.

Unless AMD has done some radical work on both the architectures of it's CPU's and GPU's HBm alone will not be enough IMO. Just look at the 980Ti Vs the 290x, both use more or less the same amount of power yet the 980Ti on the same manufacturing process and GDDR5 is 50% ahead of the 290x. GCN architecture needs a lot more development to become competitive against Nvidia's latest offerings, closing the gap by just adding more cores and making the chip bigger and drawing more juice is only a short term solution (not to mention costly).

Martini1991 · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:53

humbug said:
Are you talking about Iris-Pro? that GPU is bigger than a 7870 / 270X @ 22nn vs 28nm and its not even that much faster than the A10's iGPU being half the size, that iGPU is also bottlenecked by system RAM.

Irs-Pro is still miles behind considering the vast size of it relative to performance.

Newest Iris Pro 6200 in Broadwell, faster than the R7 250 and using less power.

Intel are always working on it. You're so negative when it comes to their IGP, Intel went for the performance, now they're working on efficiency while improving performance. The broadwell part is 65W, that's the CPU and IGP.

Vince · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:54

Ayahuasca said:
Not talking about the HD4600.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-5775c-i5-5675c-broadwell,4169-6.html

I'm guessing you are talking the HD5000 or something? Even still we were talking discreet graphics before IGP and let's be honest how many people actually game on these chipsets. I have tried in the past and it's never been a great experience.

Martini1991 · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:55

Vince said:
I'm guessing you are talking the HD5000? Even still we were talking discreet graphics before IGP and let's be honest how many people actually game on these chipsets. I have tried in the past and it's never been a great experience.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-5775c-i5-5675c-broadwell,4169-6.html

Ignorance is bliss.

Ayahuasca · 2 Jun 2015 at 13:56

Vince said:
I'm guessing you are talking the HD5000? Even still we were talking discreet graphics before IGP and let's be honest how many people actually game on these chipsets. I have tried in the past and it's never been a great experience.

Please just read the link?