• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
TaKeN said:
I don't see any evidence in there where AMD officially announced what they'd be doing.

As per usual, most of the stuff is made up by clickbait websites, then spread around forums.

EDIT - Beaten to it by the poster above :p
Click to expand...

They are all feeding eachother, you have to read right to the end to see where their information came from, you go there are read on only to find they got it else where...... and so it goes on and on and on....
 
dml3 said:
These guys are done. Id rather see Intel get into the Card market right now and let AMD die off like they should have years ago
Click to expand...

Because Intel has a brilliant history when it comes to discreet GPU's - Perhaps you haven't been around long enough to remember Intels larrabee, it was the future they said, discreet graphics from the worlds largest silicon producer. So what happened? here is a link for you to read:

http://www.vrworld.com/2009/10/12/an-inconvenient-truth-intel-larrabee-story-revealed/
 
Vince said:
Because Intel has a brilliant history when it comes to discreet GPU's - Perhaps you haven't been around long enough to remember Intels larrabee, it was the future they said, discreet graphics from the worlds largest silicon producer. So what happened? here is a link for you to read:

http://www.vrworld.com/2009/10/12/an-inconvenient-truth-intel-larrabee-story-revealed/
Click to expand...

They ended up changing what Larabee was or something ultimately.

Intel have just smashed AMD's APU's IGP performance.
 
dml3 said:
AMD is a joke of a company.

1. They said at GDC they would be at Computex.
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/43945/amd-unveil-next-gen-radeon-r9-390x-computex-june/index.html

2. 980TI comes out right at Computex and AMD is no where to be found. They suddenly dont have the card at Computex

3. Now it's their own event in even more weeks.


These guys are done. Id rather see Intel get into the Card market right now and let AMD die off like they should have years ago
Click to expand...

This is a joke of a post

1.You said AMD said that they would be at Computex but wasn't
2. Point 2 is still part of point 1 so i dont really get why it deserves to be on point 2.
3. Now it's their own event coming up, as they have planned and announced and you are angry that it hasn't come sooner.

This guy is done, i'd rather see Lambchop here foaming at the mouth spitting hate in my face than another tantrum post about AMD not bringing out a card sooner.
 
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X will be the watercooled, HBM-based flagship card

World exclusive: Up until this point, most people have presumed that AMD would be launching the Radeon R9 390X as its upcoming flagship video card, but we have just had an anonymous source tell us that this is wrong.

Read more at http://www.tweaktown.com/news/45602...atercooled-hbm-based-flagship-card/index.html
Click to expand...

Read more at http://www.tweaktown.com/news/45602...atercooled-hbm-based-flagship-card/index.html
 
Ayahuasca said:
Intel focused on the iGPU instead and their new one is actually very good.
Click to expand...

Is it? Compared to what? I have the HD4600 in a laptop alongside a nvidia gtx... The Intel card is only good for one thing and that is increasing the battery life. Sorry but it really isn't that good at all.
 
Vince said:
Is it? Compared to what? I have the HD4600 in a laptop alongside a nvidia gtx... The Intel card is only good for one thing and that is increasing the battery life. Sorry but it really isn't that good at all.
Click to expand...

The HD4600 isn't the latest, not since like 2 years, and it's good compared to every single IGP solution in consumer devices, because they've got the highest performing part :p?
 
Martini1991 said:
They ended up changing what Larabee was or something ultimately.

Intel have just smashed AMD's APU's IGP performance.
Click to expand...

Are you talking about Iris-Pro? that GPU is bigger than a 7870 / 270X @ 22nn vs 28nm and its not even that much faster than the A10's iGPU being half the size, that iGPU is also bottlenecked by system RAM.

Irs-Pro is still miles behind considering the vast size of it relative to performance.

AMD are about to put HBM on APU's and that will be a game changer.
 
Martini1991 said:
They ended up changing what Larabee was or something ultimately.

Intel have just smashed AMD's APU's IGP performance.
Click to expand...

Yeah I've just seen the Toms Hardware Broadwell review, fricking scary stuff if you work for AMD. Just think how far ahead Intel would be if they actually put some effect into their drivers.

humbug said:
Are you talking about Iris-Pro? that GPU is bigger than a 7870 / 270X @ 22nn vs 28nm and its not even that much faster than the A10's iGPU being half the size, that iGPU is also bottlenecked by system RAM.

Irs-Pro is still miles behind considering the vast size of it relative to performance.

AMD are about to put HBM on APU's and that will be a game changer.
Click to expand...

Unless AMD has done some radical work on both the architectures of it's CPU's and GPU's HBm alone will not be enough IMO. Just look at the 980Ti Vs the 290x, both use more or less the same amount of power yet the 980Ti on the same manufacturing process and GDDR5 is 50% ahead of the 290x. GCN architecture needs a lot more development to become competitive against Nvidia's latest offerings, closing the gap by just adding more cores and making the chip bigger and drawing more juice is only a short term solution (not to mention costly).
 
Last edited:
humbug said:
Are you talking about Iris-Pro? that GPU is bigger than a 7870 / 270X @ 22nn vs 28nm and its not even that much faster than the A10's iGPU being half the size, that iGPU is also bottlenecked by system RAM.

Irs-Pro is still miles behind considering the vast size of it relative to performance.
Click to expand...

Newest Iris Pro 6200 in Broadwell, faster than the R7 250 and using less power.

Intel are always working on it. You're so negative when it comes to their IGP, Intel went for the performance, now they're working on efficiency while improving performance. The broadwell part is 65W, that's the CPU and IGP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom