Tomb Raider Ultra Bench

thebennyboy · 26 Oct 2015 at 01:02

Kaapstad said:
He should have no problem with his CPU speed getting a good 1080p score either as this bench does not bottleneck that much. If you look at the 1080p score I posted earlier I managed 339fps with a CPU clockspeed of 4.0ghz.

I suspect he has not enabled SLI as his scores look about right for a single stock card.

65FPS for a Titan X at stock? My 290X managed 61FPS...

Am i missing something?

Kaapstad · 26 Oct 2015 at 01:09

thebennyboy said:
65FPS for a Titan X at stock? My 290X managed 61FPS...

Am i missing something?

TitanXs are better overclockers than 290Xs and Quartz is running his @stock.

Your Haswell based CPU is more efficient than an ivy bridge 3770S.

You are also probably using better RAM with your 4790k as well.

thebennyboy · 26 Oct 2015 at 01:27

Kaapstad said:
TitanXs are better overclockers than 290Xs and Quartz is running his @stock.

Your Haswell based CPU is more efficient than an ivy bridge 3770S.

You are also probably using better RAM with your 4790k as well.

I'm only running 1600Mhz memory. Nothing special.

Quartz · 26 Oct 2015 at 09:33

Well, I triple-checked, and @thebennyboy is correct: I found I indeed had SLI disabled.

2x Titan X SLI Stock
i7-3770S Stock (3.1 GHz base)
358.50 drivers

1080p

TombRaider%201080p%20SLI_zpsdrx3m7ec.jpg

4K

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have an appoinment with the Mess Webley.

Kaapstad · 26 Oct 2015 at 09:52

Scoreboard updated.

scorchedbee · 26 Oct 2015 at 10:16

980 ACX 2.0, 2500k stock

MAX 84
MIN 54
AVG 62.6

any idea why my screenshot is fully black when i paste it?

Intra-Agnostic · 26 Oct 2015 at 10:54

scorchedbee said:
980 ACX 2.0, 2500k stock

MAX 84
MIN 54
AVG 62.6

any idea why my screenshot is fully black when i paste it?

Assuming its a Steam game, use F12 to take a screenshot not Print Screen

Quartz · 26 Oct 2015 at 11:14

I used Fraps for my screen captures.

Radox-0 · 26 Oct 2015 at 12:24

4790k @ 4.7 Ghz, Titan X SLI @ 1350 / 1850 Drivers: 358.50

1080p

3440 x 1440

Radox-0 · 26 Oct 2015 at 13:04

Thought I would upload some R9 Nano benchmarks

4690k @ 4.4 Ghz, R9 Nano @ 1050 Mhz / 500 Mhz Drivers: 15.201 (I think? not to sure how AMD driver number works as I don't seem to have a single xx.xx number)

1080p

3440p

Kaapstad · 26 Oct 2015 at 13:28

Scoreboard updated.

Uncle Petey · 26 Oct 2015 at 13:32

3970x @4.4
980Ti @I dunno, it fluctuates between 1455-1507 on this bench. Mem @1753
358.50

1080p

1440P

Kaapstad · 26 Oct 2015 at 16:18

And on the scoreboard.

spikerules · 27 Oct 2015 at 08:58

AMD Nano
15.9.1 Beta
1055/500
CPU: 6600k @ 4.5GHz

Min: 13.6
Max: 25.2
Average: 19.4

2160p

Min: 28
Max: 56
Average: 40.7

1440p

Kaapstad · 27 Oct 2015 at 15:53

spikerules said:
AMD Nano
15.9.1 Beta
1055/500

Min: 13.6
Max: 25.2
Average: 19.4

2160p

Min: 28
Max: 56
Average: 40.7

1440p

Could you post your CPU and clockspeed please.

spikerules · 27 Oct 2015 at 19:50

Kaapstad said:
Could you post your CPU and clockspeed please.

Posted above as an update to my original post.

Kaapstad · 28 Oct 2015 at 08:15

spikerules said:
Posted above as an update to my original post.

Thanks and on the scoreboard.

spikerules · 28 Oct 2015 at 11:59

Sorry Kaapstad, mistake on my part! The CPU is at 4.5GHz. I forgot I raised it by 100Hz

pandem0nium · 28 Oct 2015 at 14:39

1080P

960T @ 6 cores, 4.2ghz.
7870 @ 1257/1400.
15.10 beta drivers.

spikerules · 28 Oct 2015 at 14:39

Nvidia 980Ti Hydro Copper @ 1378/1993
Intel 5930k @ 4.6GHz
Drivers: 358.50

2160p

Min: 18.8
Max: 34.9
AVG: 26.8

1440p

Min: 40.0
Max: 78.0
AVG: 58.0

1080p

Min: 64.0
Max: 118.0
AVG: 88.5