Vulkan and DX12 on new GPU'S

Doom112 · 7 Aug 2016 at 13:39

N19h7m4r3 said:
Any time someone has mentioned and showed DOOM or ATOS you've dismissed them.

Also all 3 vids you linked are well over a month old, with older drivers, and older version of the game. Got an updated one showing of all the latest updates like the GTX 1060/480 one?

Even in all of them the Fury X is beating the 980Ti and Titan X, just like the 480 is beating the 970 and 1060.
So what's your point? That AMD is doing better in all the test linked so far; with the only exception in DX12 being ROTTR?

Where i dismissed doom benchmarks? Yes AMD new cards are performing very well. RX 480 is nearly 20% faster then GTX 1060 in doom benchmarks.

shankly1985 · 7 Aug 2016 at 13:48

Doom112 said:
Please use common sense. If a Fury X cannot maintain 60fps @ 1080p then you consider this a good port? It is ported from a HD 7790 ,which is in Xbox one. A Fury X (8.6 Tflops) cannot maintain proper 60 fps ,which is ported from HD 7790 (1.3 Tflops).

You can win arguments by providing example like Doom and ATOS but not by posting this rubbish.

If you use common sense you would know this game been patched a lot, your videos posted above are out of date lol

Again I show you side by side latest version tested and you still have something to say.

This isn't about you, if you think a game looks like a 360 game or any of that bull crap. End of the day it's a benchmark side by side clearly showing AMD has a massive advantage in low level APIs.

Again the rock solid proof is out there for all to see.

Doom112 · 7 Aug 2016 at 13:54

shankly1985 said:
If you use common sense you would know this game been patched a lot, your videos posted above are out of date lol

Again I show you side by side latest version tested and you still have something to say.

This isn't about you, if you think a game looks like a 360 game or any of that bull crap. End of the day it's a benchmark side by side clearly showing AMD has a massive advantage in low level APIs.

Again the rock solid proof is out there for all to see.

There is no patch performance after the release of GTX 1080. Use google before arguing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsaSdTMv7ms

Game at max settings cannot get even 50fps on 1080p by one of the best GPU right now. If you think this port can make your argument valid then god help your logic.

shankly1985 · 7 Aug 2016 at 13:56

Doom112 said:
There is no patch performance after the release of GTX 1080. Use google before arguing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsaSdTMv7ms

Game at max settings cannot get even 50fps on 1080p by one of the best GPU right now. If you think this port can make your argument valid then god help your logic.

Then explain the video I posted lol he lie? Because I can clearly see frame rate top of the screen.

Even that video alone proves my point! A FuryX keeping up with a 1080 in DX12 tells me AMD is doing something right.

N19h7m4r3 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:04

Doom112 said:
Where i dismissed doom benchmarks? Yes AMD new cards are performing very well. RX 480 is nearly 20% faster then GTX 1060 in doom benchmarks.

Here is one example of you trying to dismiss early Vulkan reviews because you didn't like the performance increase AMD got over NV.

Now you seem to be singing a different tune it seems, after that thread and not being able to back up your claims.

https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=29776982&postcount=422

shankly1985 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:11

Ok Quantum Break I see the confusion here, the video I posted above is using Ultra Preset, the other videos are going one step further and increasing the graphic settings past Ultra. Like Ultra+ Preset

Doom112 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:12

N19h7m4r3 said:
Here is one example of you trying to dismiss early Vulkan reviews because you didn't like the performance increase AMD got over NV.

Now you seem to be singing a different tune it seems, after that thread and not being able to back up your claims.

https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=29776982&postcount=422

I am not. I never see take computerbase seriously due their 10-20 sec benchmark.

Coming to RX 480 vs GTX 1060 on Vulkan Doom then RX 480 is killing GTX 1060.

Doom112 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:13

shankly1985 said:
Ok Quantum Break I see the confusion here the video I posted above is using Ultra Preset, the other videos are going one step further and increasing the graphic settings past Ultra.

What? You are saying that Fury X, GTX 980 Ti, GTX 1080, GTX 1070 cannot max out on 1080p or maintain proper FPS?

There is no excuse for any game that cannot maintain 60 fps @ ultra on 1080p with these GPU mentioned.

You are just making DX12 embarrassing.

shankly1985 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:14

Doom112 said:
I am not. I never see take computerbase seriously due their 10-20 sec benchmark.

Coming to RX 480 vs GTX 1060 on Vulkan Doom then RX 480 is killing GTX 1060 in this and DX12 and Vulkan Titles

Fixed

shankly1985 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:18

Doom112 said:
What? You are saying that Fury X, GTX 980 Ti, GTX 1080, GTX 1070 cannot max out on 1080p or maintain proper FPS?

You are just making DX12 embarrassing.

Depends on Graphic settings used, some games use crazy amount of Graphic intensive tasks that kill performance!!! Reason these are "NOT" a PRESET!!

The ULTRA PRESET you can keep 60fps, BUT if you have the Power go and try these more intensive Graphic options!!!

Isn't that the great thing about PC ?? we given these options?

Doom112 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:18

shankly1985 said:
Fixed

Selective titles.

Doom112 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:20

shankly1985 said:
Depends on Graphic settings used, some games use crazy amount of Graphic intensive tasks that kill performance!!! Reason these are "NOT" a PRESET!!

The ULTRA PRESET you can keep 60fps, BUT if you have the Power go and try these more intensive Graphic options!!!

Isn't that the great thing about PC ?? we given these options?

It is not. There are many game ,which looks far better then QB but runs well on even GPUs like R9 290, GT 780 , GTX 780 Ti but posting a **** port like this is no sense for at least.

shankly1985 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:21

Doom112 said:
Selective titles.

Can only think of one Tomb Raider! Has this been benchmarked yet with latest Async Patches??
All the rest the 480 smashes the 1060... Any other titles in your sentence you say Selective "Titles"

shankly1985 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:24

Doom112 said:
It is not. There are many game ,which looks far better then QB but runs well on even GPUs like R9 290, GT 780 , GTX 780 Ti but posting a **** port like this is no sense for at least.

Isn't that again your own Opinion? Like Hitman is a 360 title TO you?? For Me QB is an excellent looking game.

You seem to go into this defensive mode I noticed by saying a title looks rubbish to defend your beliefs LOL so because it looks rubbish to you then the benchmark numbers are flawed :rolleyes:

Bah bahhhhh

Doom112 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:24

shankly1985 said:
Can only think of one Tomb Raider! Has this been benchmarked yet with latest Async Patches??
All the rest the 480 smashes the 1060... Any other titles in your sentence you say Selective "Titles"

DOTA 2, Forza, the talos principle ,however, AMD do not benefits and this is the reason you wont even consider these games.

This is a latest RX 480 vs GTX 1060.

http://wccftech.com/rx-480-gtx-1060-dx12-vulkan-tested/

Doom112 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:26

shankly1985 said:
Isn't that again your own Opinion? Like Hitman is a 360 title TO you?? For Me QB is an excellent looking game.

You seem to go into this defensive mode I noticed by saying a title looks rubbish to defend your beliefs LOL so because it looks rubbish to you then the benchmark numbers are flawed

Bah bahhhhh

What does DX12 does for Hitman 2016? There are certain game on last gen console ,which look better then Hitman 2016.

shankly1985 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:34

Doom112 said:
DOTA 2, Forza, the talos principle ,however, AMD do not benefits and this is the reason you wont even consider these games.

This is a latest RX 480 vs GTX 1060.

http://wccftech.com/rx-480-gtx-1060-dx12-vulkan-tested/

After this benchmark you will say Wccf are Nvidia shill

Wont consider these games? How meany times have I said Forza 6 is my personal favorite DX12 title to date??

Reason I haven't posted any Forza 6 videos is because I finding it hard to get up to dated footage showcasing this title that has been patched a lot to support Gsync and Freesync and even unlocked Frame rate.

Don't start with the Graphs LOL said time and time again what I think about them. Nar I known Keith before he got the job there me and him follows each other on Twitter he a nice guy.

shankly1985 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:37

Doom112 said:
What does DX12 does for Hitman 2016? There are certain game on last gen console ,which look better then Hitman 2016.

For one and going by what DX11 Hitman Absolution was massively effected on was CPU bottleneck when in massive crowds of people. Why do you think on Absolution the benchmark software was designed around crowds of people?

With DX12 this has helped Hitman 2016 pull off high frame rate when massive crowds are on screen.

Doom112 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:38

shankly1985 said:
Wont consider these games? How meany times have I said Forza 6 is my personal favorite DX12 title to date??

Reason I haven't posted any Forza 6 videos is because I finding it hard to get up to dated footage showcasing this title that has been patched a lot to support Gsync and Freesync and even unlocked Frame rate.

Don't start with the Graphs LOL said time and time again what I think about them. Nar I known Keith before he got the job there me and him follows each other on Twitter he a nice guy.

I told you that wont consider benchmarks in which AMD do not win ,therefore, it is waste time to argue.

This another benchmark ,which shows that you do not require a $350 CPU to run a $2xx card.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erAh6EAEu08

N19h7m4r3 · 7 Aug 2016 at 14:53

Doom112 said:
I told you that wont consider benchmarks in which AMD do not win ,therefore, it is waste time to argue.

What are you on about? He never dismissed Forza, he literally told you it's his favourite DX12 title. :confused:

Also that video linked is every similar to one that was also in a thread where people disagreed with you and in the end you simply disappeared because you couldn't actually justify or back up your statements. As back then you were saying you Needed a $350 to run a $200 GPU well.

https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18741760