Soldato
mark1 said:Imagine that scene with AA and AF All those jaggies
What i meant was that real-time rendering will show up jaggies without AA or AF, considering how many edges etc there are in the image.NokkonWud said:All those jaggies? Where?
I see image reduction and compression. Nothing caused by lack of AA and AF.
KraniX said:first time i've played cs in ages, i wasn't too rubbish considering, but then there were a load of french people on the server and we know they don't like to fight, heh.
mark1 said:What fps do you get with that? Is it running in DX9 mode?
Brecourt kills my fps with 16xAF (i don't have the X1800 yet, still on my 6600gt's)
Nice. I can't run COD2 multiplayer in DX9, the fps gets too low for me to play properly.eXSBass said:DX9 mode all the way. FPS around 50 - 60. When it's extremely atmospheric it goes down to 45 minimum, but that's very playable.
(Not at all overclocked either. Well chuffed )
Second time lucky!BloodWolf said:
eXSBass said:DX9 mode all the way. FPS around 50 - 60. When it's extremely atmospheric it goes down to 45 minimum, but that's very playable.
(Not at all overclocked either. Well chuffed )
Edit: I'll tell you what. I missed around 12 months worth of updates from ATi, with the drivers and catalyst control centres. Today, when I decided to update I cranked everything up and it's running a dream. It may be due to the latest drivers I have.
R34P3R said:45 is playable to you? My main rig died so i had to play on my old rig and was getting <70 fps on that and i couldn't play at all. By the time i saw enemies i was dead got a few lucky thompson spray kills that
is all.
I feel the need for atleast 120 fps to play confortably, everything seems smooth enough with about that amount although im used to around 200 constant.