I don't understand why there is no incremental patch? Why do we have to download the full OS each time?!
Really? I just thought this was an abnormally large patch. I didn't realise it downloads the whole system each time.
I don't understand why there is no incremental patch? Why do we have to download the full OS each time?!
Really? I just thought this was an abnormally large patch. I didn't realise it downloads the whole system each time.
Just be thankful its not GT5, swear that game is now just a digital download, the blu ray it comes on is mostly useless..
Takes over an hour to unpack and install from blu ray, then it downloads gigs of patches which can take hours upon hours even on the quickest of connections..
PS3 has become a bit of a standing joke with its constant updating..
I've got GT5, but not played it for almost a year. I assume I will have to book a day off work to patch it should I decide to play it again![]()
It took me 4 hours in total to download all of the patches and perform the optional install of the game, that's only on a 5MB connection and starting from a totally unpatched launch version of the game. It's a long time, but it's not as bad as some are making out. As for the actual OS updates I've never found them to be very big downloads in terms of time taken, again I'm only on a 5MB ADSL connection, not some uber fibre optic or 50MB cable line.![]()
You think 4 hours is not bad?
Lol .
As far as I'm aware its the full image each time unless I'm mistaken. Each patch is over >500mb? *Unless they've changed it recently.
I'm almost certain this hasnt been the case for a while
That the thing, I'm on 120Mb Virgin and the PSN downloads probably max out at 10Mb and that is on a good day!
If I am grabbing something from PSN+ then I leave it on over night, its a shambles and it is as bad as everyone is making out.
Wired up to my PS3 with 76MB down and 18MB up and it's pitifully slow most of the time.
On Steam I get 9.5 MB/s most times whereas on PS3 I get between 1 and 2 MB/s.