Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
You are right, I haven't,, cause nobody explains it to me. They just claim it's a problem. Is it a problem that I have to also drop settings on a brand new 1300€ 7900xtx? Or that's okay, but dropping settings on a 2.5 year old 699€ card is a sin cause it's nvidia branded?
NO freaking card can do 4k in this game, WTF are you talking about??? The 3090 has 24GB of ram and can't do 4k. The 6800xt has 16GB and can't do 4k. The 6950xt has 16gb and cant do 4k. The 7900xtx has 24GB and can't do 4k. The 7900xt has 20GB and can't do 4k. The 4090 has 24GB and can't do 4k. The 3080ti has 12gb and can't do 4k.
Ι did. Proves my point. At 4k DLSS Q (which is basically his 1440p results) is faster than a 6950xt, which was much more expensive and has 16GB. The 6800xt which was it's actual competitor gets blasted. None of these can do 4k natively anyways whether they have 1gb or 1TB of vram caue they run out of grunt. Unless you are going to play the game at 21 fps with 14 minimums at 4k native with your 6800xt, I don't see wtf your point is. Id much much much much much rather have the 3080 than the 6800xt for hogwards. Not even a contest.
You insist on the nonsense that a 3060 plays the game better than a 3080. As if you were going to play with any of these cards at native 4k. That's delusional. Not a single card can play at 4k natively - even the 4090 has issues. So WHAT are you talking about? The 3080 only has vram issues with settings that the rest of the cards are getting 20 fps anyways, so who cares. It's unplayable on ALL of them.
Quite common at least in threads like this.
This is basically on point condensing pages of waffle. What's comical is some of the highly active defenders have moved on from a 3080 to a 3080Ti and 4090's. This is exactly what we predicted as it avoids the problem.
Are you also ignoring every other reviewers results?
forums.overclockers.co.uk
forums.overclockers.co.uk
I mean the fact that some random people have been able to fix/improve the performance by adding a few config lines to a file says it all.......Nah it's fine, you convinced me, knowing that my 16GB 6800xt doesn't run out of vram while spitting out 20 fps makes the game more enjoyable for me. Thanks for opening my eyes.
forums.overclockers.co.uk
Come on man, you seriously can't say that there isn't also issues with the game too.......
Don't agree with all that but the reason it's a problem is because a couple paid an extra £750 for the 3090 over the 3080 and they haven't gotten that "value" back yet, they thought there would be loads of games by now where a 3080 would be having to run everything on low whilst they could use max settings on their 3090s but alas that hasn't happened and when a 3080 generally ***** the bed so does a 3090
Shall we create a thread for 24GB now?
The PC gaming scene really is doomed if people aren't willing to acknowledge when games are poorly optimised/developed and instead just think throwing more "cpu, ram, vram" at the "issues" is the way forwardI mean the fact that some random people have been able to fix/improve the performance by adding a few config lines to a file says it all.......
You might not have said it but you are definitely implying that the lack of vram is 100% the reason for performance issues here, again, maybe we should create a thread "is 24GB enough" since a 7900xtx is ******** the bed at 1080P too? Must be vram, right? What other games recently are showing issues, which are 100% down to vram and nothing else? Please don't say forspoken..........
