Caporegime
35 years of knowing the difference between a healthy CPU and a broken one.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
14th Gen "Raptor Lake Refresh"
- Thread starter Dave2150
- Start date
Soldato
Quoting the second post in this thread, as I now feel that it is actually an achievement.
CPU is ****ed. end of.
Last edited by a moderator:
As I've previously posted, people who work for Intel have previous kind of mentioned they don't run theirs above 1.45V... probably not an idle comment.
Is 1.45v the max safe recommeded voltage as I've run some benchmarks/heavy loads on my 13600K with alittle undervolt and it doesn't go above 1.1v but I've seen a few posts where peoples I9's are running above 1.45v
Last edited:
The Intel datasheet specs VCC up to 1.72V - individual cores I've seen pushing past 1.6V on some CPUs. I dunno what is max safe just aware of conversations in the past where people who work for Intel have mentioned they don't run their 13th/14th gen CPUs over 1.45V but just a throw away comment so may not be meaningful.
I am off to the red side, 7800X3D and Asrock B650 Tachi ordered from overclockers.
Been with Intel a long time but my recent stability issues have been a PITA and even though the recent bios updates have helped i feel like it's just going to fail at some point so not taking the chance.
Been with Intel a long time but my recent stability issues have been a PITA and even though the recent bios updates have helped i feel like it's just going to fail at some point so not taking the chance.
Caporegime
Jesus Christ...
Denial.
Associate
Intel sure are taking their time formulating a response
Soldato
lol, wise words. Considering your chronic allergy for wholesome facts, that's about as true a statement as we can hope to expect from someone with zero experience with Intel's hybrid architecture.
VCC spec hasn't changed from 12th Gen, also note that the datasheet is irrelevant the moment we enable XMP, or in some cases simply plug it into an enthusiast motherboard. Given that the large majority of 14th gen CPUs will have a fused VID beyond 1.45v I'm confident in saying that number is largely unimportant. There are power users who've got samples from before launch day who have been running higher VIDs, and they're still working and not exhibiting problems. Intel is telling vendors to adhere to the spec closer since all this came to light which results in more loadline and in turn more voltage under load, not less. That last bit is a fact, not speculation - so run wild with that.
Last edited:
Yes but I don't recall seeing 12th gen CPUs running much over 1.4V max, usually high 1.2x to mid 1.3x.
Soldato
Soldato
You could expect almost every CPU to be impacted then, if that's the working theory.
No need for this method now. They can update the BIOS to select the Intel Base Profiles.
Last edited:
These days for a lot of publicly traded corporations only short term money matters (because of the financial reports and shareholders and push for infinite growth). Expect them to react with that in mind.
Soldato
they will care when their stock price tanks
Soldato
Well if this fixes the issue on non degraded chips its a trade off I imagine most will be happy to swallow. Honestly its nothing that anyone would really notice in real world scenarios.Depends on the workload. Gaming, no. High current all core workloads, yes some.
Last edited: