Associate
- Joined
- 22 Sep 2007
- Posts
- 2,184
- Location
- Abingdon
If only I had £100k for every time I encountered a bully at school.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74fc7/74fc7f71c41aa634ffaff3b38cd358bae82946e6" alt="GoFundMe.jpg"
So why isn't every white kid that had the crap beaten out of them and vids shared online receiving £££?
So then I ask, why don't we see these funds being set up when a white kid suffers equally horrendous treatment? What is so special about this case?
Because people assume an immigrant will not have much money and security as a native Brit with multiple generations of established family in this country, loads of uncles, cousins etc.
It's clear that an immigrant child wouldn't have many people to fall back on.
The fact that he's a syrian refugee. One with a little sense would assume they don't have much money and people are compassionate enough that they don't want to see a lack of financial security also be a problem for this child.
4 million children in this country live in poverty. I'd work on the assumption that any child who is being bullied is suffering from poor financial security based upon that statistic!
You think posh kids with rich parents don't get picked on?
Heck I have major concerns for people living in poverty, worrying about some kid who is trending on social media and whining about people's compassion for one particular case, and saying "ohh it's only happening because he's not white" is not going to solve the general poverty issue.
The fact is people are not "purely donating because he's not white", and the fact that most white bullying victims don't also get crowd donations doesn't validate ANYTHING lol.
For the third time: donating because people think he's a poor refugee is TOTALLY different from people donating purely because the kid in question is NOT-white. I'm not sure why this is being denied?
People are likely to be donating because it's gone viral, it's the "current event" that everyone is talking about, social pressures and just the fact that the majority of decent people just flat out hate racists. This hurts the racists more than it helps the kid tbh.
I disagree. It appears to me like a liberalised form of racism, where more 'compassion' is shown to non whites.For the third time: donating because people think he's a poor refugee is TOTALLY different from people donating purely because the kid in question is NOT-white. I'm not sure why this is being denied?
. . . Far more deserving cases on these sites that get nowhere near their targets. . . .
And I am quite sure that these far more deserving / worthy cases benefit from and are immensely grateful for your boundless generosity.. . . I think there are far more worthy cases for that level of pecuniary gift! . . .
I disagree. It appears to me like a liberalised form of racism, where more 'compassion' is shown to non whites.
He will already get exactly the same level of help and charity other children in the country do. Why does he need another £100k on top of that.I think people are turning this into some race vs race thing purely because that's how their mind thinks and this triggers them. It's so obvious especially from some of the more "established" posters (not you).
More compassion?
So what about ALL domestic UK charity work involving helping children? Are you saying this fundraiser trumps all domestic UK charity work?