16 year old bullying a Syrian refugee with a broken arm, choking and waterboarding him
- Thread starter twistedheat
- Start date
ITT: Raging white middle aged men who had it tougher in the golden era of schooling
Why are you assuming or even bringing someones skin colour into the argument?
Classic racism.
Everybody's got ai-- racism! My mother and my brother and my sister, too. Racism! Everybody's got racism!
I don't think there's any scope for sensible discussion now anywhere on social media.
There's no room for dissenting opinion these days. The fight is over what group-think we're all going to have to universally adopt in the years to come.
e: And let's be completely clear: it's the "liberals" that want to quash all dissent, and turn any opinion they don't agree with into hate-speech they can prosecute.
"Liberals" who can hype a little spray of water into waterboarding, but only because the target was a refugee. Anyone else having that treatment is just getting water sprayed on them. Heck, if someone threw a whole bucket of water on Tommy Robinson, it wouldn't be waterboarding then.
Which just shows how identity politics is now colouring facts. The same thing happening to two different people would be interpreted completely differently. One way it's racially motivated torture (!), the other would be a "social justice" protest.
I don't think there's any scope for sensible discussion now anywhere on social media.
There's no room for dissenting opinion these days. The fight is over what group-think we're all going to have to universally adopt in the years to come.
e: And let's be completely clear: it's the "liberals" that want to quash all dissent, and turn any opinion they don't agree with into hate-speech they can prosecute.
"Liberals" who can hype a little spray of water into waterboarding, but only because the target was a refugee. Anyone else having that treatment is just getting water sprayed on them. Heck, if someone threw a whole bucket of water on Tommy Robinson, it wouldn't be waterboarding then.
Which just shows how identity politics is now colouring facts. The same thing happening to two different people would be interpreted completely differently. One way it's racially motivated torture (!), the other would be a "social justice" protest.
Last edited:
No, he's a twonk
Another incident, this time using advanced torture techniques involving an iron bar and bike seat.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...gang-youths-beating-teenage-boy-iron-bar.html
Someone set up a Gofundme page.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...gang-youths-beating-teenage-boy-iron-bar.html
Someone set up a Gofundme page.
Lol, it wasn't the "libruls" that hyped it it was the news itself... nice research BRO.
Go ahead, you can start it.
Racist post is racistITT: Raging white middle aged men who had it tougher in the golden era of schooling
Now they're suing Tommy Stephen for interjecting, good, he can go back to prison as his current situation doesn't allow for being in two messes at once.
And mega lols at people watching Sargon, who has to cry to his fanbase (which he incited) to stop them insulting his miscarriage'd child because they're really just cool lovely people that are just "misunderstood" and totally not total ********.
And mega lols at people watching Sargon, who has to cry to his fanbase (which he incited) to stop them insulting his miscarriage'd child because they're really just cool lovely people that are just "misunderstood" and totally not total ********.
Well local news reporting on more issues at the school, while unreleated to this case, doesn't show the school in good light. https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news...iour-almondbury-community-school-out-15486833, on the video it starts at 1 minute. The school needs a massive shakeup and parents really need to do something to make these kids listen.
How is supporting free speech and a miscarriage of justice virtue signalling?
How is it not "signalling virtue"? What's good for the goose...
I asked you how it is first.
Yes, you did, and I answered by asking you how it isn't.
Is "virtue signalling" reserved only for people who support causes with which you disagree?
One doesn't answer a question with a question as it doesn't actually provide an answer.
What's the difference between the "virtue signalling" of those supporting Dankula's cause and those supporting the Syrian boy's?