Piggymon said:She does look lovely !
Looks wicked, it's a 2.5 litre straight six though, which coupled to an auto box might not give you the fuel returns you're looking for.
All this depends on your definition of 'good fuel economy' of course.
Piggymon said:She does look lovely !
Piggymon said:She does look lovely !
The insurance was a nice surprise as well , was expecting it to be in the £700 mark rather than £500
It's an Auto which I don't mind at all ... I'm kinda growing out of revving the nuts outta things![]()
Scuzi said:You could easily get a Passat 1.8T for the sort of budget which would make a great motorway cruiser. If you don't mind an older car though, the BMW 5's would be my choice.
Scuzi said:No it isn't. The Passat is a much smoother drive. It doesn't handle as well but it's definitely a hell of a lot more comfortable.
[TW]Fox said:No, it really isn't. There isn't much in it.
Anyone who says a Passat is 'a hell of a lot more comfortable' has the most odd pereception of anyone I have met. It is true that the Passat is marginally smoother becuase it's softer, but there is no 'hell of a lot' in it, you'd need to drive both back to back to notice the difference for a start.
Piggymon said:Top post Foxy !
Thanks mate , really helpfull![]()
Which one is the facelift and what do you think of the one I posted ?
[TW]Fox said:There were also engine changes - the 2.2 was uprated from 150bhp to 170bhp, the 523i was dropped and replaced with the 192bhp 525i, the 528i was dropped and replaced with the 231bhp 530i. The 525d was introduced.
.
Jez said:Wasnt the pre-facelift 520i actually a 150bhp 1991c unit? (as opposed to just an older 2.2)
Still 6cyl but i'd avoid it, too small and underpowered for such a large car.
masterk said:The word Audi has not been mentioned yet![]()
Jez said:They dont make anything as good as the E39 for anything like the budget.
masterk said:The word Audi has not been mentioned yet![]()
Jez said:Yay another barge convert![]()
Piggymon said:I had a P reg accord a while ago and loved it