Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Aug 2004
- Posts
- 7,607
laughable
Take it back 2 seconds. What was said?duc999 said:Schumacher , and I quote Brundle , "took his apex , as he is entitled to do"
Hehe, I'm putting it back on//Mike said:He said if MSC did his victory jump, he'd go over and punch him.
For the simple reason that they don't want the sport to die. The thing that keeps people coming back to F1 is the entertainment value - if that is removed, then why should the fans fork out ridiculous amounts of money to see it? With the fans gone, the sponsors would be out of there sharpish and it'd be bye-bye F1.Dolph said:I'm trying to work out why some people are saying the rules of a sport should be changed for entertainment purposes......
//Mike said:He said if MSC did his victory jump, he'd go over and punch him.
xyphic said:.................I'm not saying it will get that far. I believe that F1 will recover from this. However, it's going to be a lot harder to recover than if the FIA had made some concessions for the sake of keeping the fans happy.
//Mike said:Actually, another point for Dolph. Why is it then that they are always changing the rules at the start of the season, for virtually every sport? It wouldn't be for entertainment value the vast majority of the time would it?
Surely you must agree with the changing of some rules?
//Mike said:MSC looks very smug...
stu4691 said:Its one thing to change the rules at the start of the season when the teams are given a chance to react, quite another to change them a day/hour/minutes before a race.
//Mike said:Glad to see them not spraying champagne , except for Monteiro.
Fire 1 said:Why did paul stoddart allow his cars to finish the race and score seven valuable points?