Late GPMA move fails to foil Mosley’s vision
Enmity between F1's carmakers and FIA President Max Mosley resumed in Europe this week.
At 10pm the night before Wednesday's meeting of the world motor sport council, the GPMA alliance - including five manufacturer-owned teams - faxed a letter to the FIA's Monaco office; even though Mosley was in Paris for the meeting.
It highlighted 'concerns' with the 2008 rules, asking the council to consider implementing their ideas rather than ratify the controversial Mosley-plan.
The council, however, basically ignored the GPMA appeal, Mosley noting in a reply that 'none of you attended' meetings in 2005 'to discuss the 2008 regulations, despite repeated invitations to do so' .
So, in one stroke, the draft 2008 rules became law.
As well as a three-year engine 'freeze', the F1 calendar will be expanded to a maximum of 20 races, the 10-place grid penalty replaced with a 15kg 'ballast' scheme, and the $48m new-team bond axed.
Also in 2008, testing will be cut to 30,000km per team, spare cars banned, parc ferme conditions in force all weekend, and gearboxes will have to last four races.
Letter from the GPMA to Max Mosley
Dear Max
Thank you for your letter of 15 March 2006, enclosing a copy of the 2008 Sporting Regulations which are to be approved by the World Motor Sport Council on 22 March 2006.
We are pleased to note that the FIA wishes to involved teams in constructive discussion with a view to adopting changes to such Regulations with further aims as set out in your letter, once entries into the 2008 Championship have been accepted.
However, prior to any such discussions, we feel that it is appropriate for us to identify as number of significant concerns which we would prefer to raise now before the said Regulations are approved by the World Motor Sport Council.
Organisation Agreement
The 1998 Concorde Agreement, to which the teams and the FIA are parties, guarantee the current participating teams, during each year of the term, a right to entry into the Championship. Furthermore, the 1998 Concorde Agreement provides for the teams, as stakeholders in the sport, to have a significant role in its governance. These provisions appear to have been removed from the latest proposals submitted by the FIA post 2007 and we would ask that provisions to accommodate these concerns be taken into account in the draft 2008 Sporting Regulations to be approved by the World Motor Sport Council.
Engine Homologation
Whilst all signatories to this letter (and Cosworth) agree and confirm that they are committed to reducing engine costs, we realise that there is no time to discuss this issue further with you before the meeting of the World Motor Sport Council; we would respectfully request that Regulation 86e and Appendix 6 be agreed before the Sporting Regulations are adopted.
Rule Changes
We have noted that the provisions for changes in the Sporting and Technical Regulations which are currently set out in Appendix 5 of the draft 2008 Sporting Regulations, are different from those proposed in your letter of 18th November 2005. We would wish to see the composition, voting structure and proves of the Formula One Commission and its related working groups being established in line with your 19th November 2005 proposal. In particular, we believe that, further to previous discussions, if the majority of teams vote in favour of a change, such a change should not be capable of being vetoed by the F1 Commission.
In addition to the above, we do have a number of other concerns which we would also wish to discuss with you, which include the restriction on testing (Article 63 (b)), the engine ballast penalty (Article 86 (a)) and the gear box rules (Article 87). We believe that changes could be made to these provisions which would better achieve the FIA’s three objectives set out in your 15th March 2006 letter.
We very much hope that you will accept this letter in the constructive spirit in which it is offered and take our above concerns into consideration before the draft 2008 Sporting Regulations are submitted to the World Motor Sport Council for approval. Further, we would be very happy to discuss them with you in a constructive manner at a mutually convenient time and place.
Kind Regards
Yours sincerely
BMW, Honda, McLaren, Renault, Toyota and GPMA.
Letter from Mosley to the GPMA
Gentlemen
Thank you for your letter of 21 March, which was sent to us at 22.11 last night.
The World Motor Sport Council took account of the contents of your letter, but noted that it contained no proposal which could be substituted for any of those in front of the Council, sent to you on 1 March and the again, with minor modifications, on 15 March.
The World Motor Sport Council has also noted that none of you attended the meetings which were held early in 2005 to discuss the 2008 regulations, despite repeated invitations to do so, and that the proposals which you promised to deliver to us in June 2005 are still not to hand.
In the circumstances, the Council decided to adopt the proposed Sporting Regulations in their entirety and extend an invitation to all interested teams to enter the 2008 Championship and participate in discussions on any element which they believe could be improved.
The Council notes that although the 2008 Sporting Regulations are now fixed, any element could be changed on proposal of a simple majority of the entered teams sitting in the Sporting Working Group and that the Formula 1 Commission or the World Motor Sport Council would only reject such proposal in the overall interest of the Formula One World Championship or of motor sport in general.
Yours sincerely
Max Mosley.