LG 34" 2560x1080 144HZ gsync:
http://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-34UC89G-B-ultrawide-monitor
$999
Lol......
http://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-34UC89G-B-ultrawide-monitor
$999
Lol......
$999 = fail34"+2560x1080=fail.
$999 = fail
As per usual, pricing is a joke for monitors and honestly who in their right mind would pay for this when you can get a 34" 100hz gsync 1440 for the same price or cheaper....
RGB all the things! And add £100 onto the price for a couple of LED strips and some pre-existing software.Speaking of asus, looks like they will be revealing a new 34" rog swift:
https://www.facebook.com/ASUSROG/videos/10156107737407388/
I wouldn't be surprised if it is still using one of the same panels (possibly VA this time since it has native 100HZ and with gsync, they could potentially push it to 120+HZ) though just with RGB lighting....
RGB all the things! And add £100 onto the price for a couple of LED strips and some pre-existing software.
Depressing doesn't even cover it if it's Va, can't tolerate the smear on those panels. Currently rma my pg348q and nothing in the market tempts me. PC monitors are so depressing ..... think I'm finally gonna trade pioneer krp 500a to oled and move PC back to living room
is that really the lineup for the rest of the year?! Nothing in 37 inch 100+hz and gsync?
Speaking of asus, looks like they will be revealing a new 34" rog swift:
https://www.facebook.com/ASUSROG/videos/10156107737407388/
I wouldn't be surprised if it is still using one of the same panels (possibly VA this time since it has native 100HZ and with gsync, they could potentially push it to 120+HZ) though just with RGB lighting....
3440x1440 120hz IPS count me in
If it is 120HZ (with an overclock), it will probably be a VA panel i.e. the same as the AOC agon 35"
Much downside to VA other than viewing angles over IPS?
I hope not . Will have to see although looking i think you may be right. The new acer z35p is VA and if AOC is VA then the new asus may be aswell.
Much downside to VA other than viewing angles over IPS?
Aside from viewing angles/colour consistency and "possibly" some smearing in certain transitions (mostly dark objects on a light background), not really imo but in return you get a higher contrast ratio with better blacks and little to no backlight bleed.
PCM2 did a good article comparing 100HZ VA and IPS ultrawides:
https://pcmonitors.info/others/ips-vs-va-100hz-ultrawides/
If that PG35VQ is 2560x1080 @ 35" then it's a joke. It would render any benefit from HDR virtually pointless... assuming it's true HDR, which I doubt as these panels are unlikely to be 1000nit brightness.
I do worry PC monitors will go the same way as TV's, with every new model claiming to offer HDR while not being remotely capable of it.
EDIT: Well according to THIS, it's 3440x1440, so that's OK. I don't know what panel they're using though... HDR needs 10-bit and 1000nits. I don't know of a 35" 21:9 panel that offers this, but there isn't one that does 200Hz either, so perhaps it's an all new one?