Real wheels just wouldn't have that sort of outcome.
You're not telling the truth again. There is no way to predict what will happen. Anyone who says they can is lying.
Real wheels just wouldn't have that sort of outcome.
He didn't say he can predict roulette.You're not telling the truth again. There is no way to predict what will happen. Anyone who says they can is lying.
RNG isn't roulette. There is no physics involved, there is a number generated and the little cartoon wheel pretends to drop the ball into it. A real wheel DOES factor in physical attributes and yes a computing assistant can and does help. I don't use one but I know people who do and they make a lot of money from it.
correct sirYou win a cookie
I use matrices to play roulette![]()
Well I've lost all my money before getting to the cashout level thing! That's my foray into gambling over and done withI've got my £32 working as £1 bet on 8 roulette tables. Having it do quick spin and autoplaying 50x at a go should get to the end pretty quick!
Ok....ok....You win...It's all in my head. My bankroll is a figment of my imagination and my method is a virtual non existent method, it doesn't actually exist...it's ALL IN MY TWISTED MESSED UP NON-FUNCTIONING HEAD![]()
RNG (Random Number Generator) IS NOT ROULETTE. It's a bit of software, if you want to win on Roulette you need to be disciplined and have a good money management strategy AND you need to play on a live wheel where 28 reds in a row doesn't happen.
I play roulette on a real wheel regularly and make a nice profit from it (£100+ a month). You have to stay under the radar though or you'll get banned. Casino's don't like regular winners. You also HAVE to play it as hit and run strategy.
Above all you have to have discipline. It's those that can't wait to turn £100 into £1000 in one sitting that lose it all and those players are the type that the casinos love to have losing their money!
lol.....
If you actually believe your own hype you're a hazard to yourself.
Its absolutely proven that roulette is unbeatable in the long run, so no, you don't consistently make a steady £100+ profit every month. If you have the perfect winning system, which believe me, your the ONLY roulette player in the world to have, why don't you bet more than pathetically small stakes? £100+ a month? If you've got yourself a winning roulette strategy I suggest you write a book on it and publish it, because you will never have to work a day again in your life because you sir will have published the impossible and your book sales will go through the roof!
Why not use your system to make £5,000 a month? and don't say it will raise suspicion or anything stupid like that because people wager far great amounts in casinos all across the country on a daily basis....
The one and only casino 'house' table game that is beatable is blackjack and that is ONLY if you are an extremely good card counter. Unless you can do this properly then blackjack is unbeatable too....
Only table game you can play in a casino and have your skill provide you with long term winning results is poker....and that's because its not a house v punter game...
If you ever get around to playing at any of the main casinos in London, I'm a member in most of them, please invite me to join you so you can prove me and my big mouth wrong.
Roulette isn't beatable all the time, I've already said so but if you implement a stop loss method and don't play continuously, then you can earn from it. You're assuming that I play continuously, which I don't. Once in the morning and once in the evening for a £5 to £10 profit. Factoring in the inevitable losses that do occur, I can syphon off £100 a month to spend as I want without any problems.
If you're winning +20 units a month (£100) then that's not to be sniffed at.
The method I play gives me a 80-1 chance of it being in my favour...covering zero every bet. Playing this method on a "hit and run" basis you can better avoid the duplicate lines (which cause a loss to appear). Playing continuously you get duplicate lines frequently and win streaks rarely outside 10. Playing hit and run you jump in and out so quick you'd be unlucky to hit a loss...but you DO and you have to factor this into your money management. PLaying hit and run you get win streaks in excess of 30 frequently given the 80-1 odds in your favour.
You're still making it up.
Let's pick it away. You agree, surely, that you can't win over the long term, and the outcome is entirely random...
I agree that you have losses but thus far I have won more than I've lost. I might hit a bad run and hit losses which wipe me out but I've not yet and I@ve taken out my starting bank roll 3 tiems so I'm up regardless of what may happen
Thus if you have odds of 80-1 in your favour, and you're £100 a month up. However the casino has to win 1/37th of whatever is gambled.
I have odds in my favour that of the 4 numbers to come out - it would have to beat 80-1 to beat the type of bet I'm doing
So that means for the 80 times you win £100 the total you win is 8,000. This is 36/37th of what the bank wins on the 1 time you lose. This means the stake you have is £8,222.
You are NOT going to the casino and risking £8,222 in the hopes of winning £100. Even if it was possible to manipulate the odds on the table to generate an 80-1 scenario... there is no way you are doing this.
You're exposed as telling lies.
this is so retarded
what difference does it make if you come back in the evening or you just play the next spin?
a losing pattern happens more during continuous play than if you're playing twice a day where you'd be very unlucky to hit a loss straight out in the sequence of play. There are more wins than losses so to hit a loss you'd be unlucky. Playing continuously you will hit a loss faster than jumping in for one win and then shutting down.
absolutely no difference at all....
stop loss is meaningless if you're going to come back again rubbish. Stop loss helps you stop chasing a losing bet and risking more money. If you have a stop loss in place you take the hit and move on by stopping betting- whether you play 100 times in a go or you play a couple of times each day for 50 days is irrelevant - they're independent events, you simply played 100 times.... you seem to be under the impression that the spins aren't independent and they somehow affect subsequent spins - this is the typical gamblers fallacy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler's_fallacy
each spin is an independent event - to try to argue otherwise just shows you up as a typical degenerate gambler