• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

3DMark Sky Diver Benchmark Thread

New best from me,

http://www.3dmark.com/sd/2366029

SCORE
33672 with AMD Radeon R9 290X(1x) and Intel Core i7-5820X
Graphics Score 45155
Physics Score 15804
Combined Score 27802

5820K @4.5
290X @1200/1600

sadly due to a few issues with powerplay and the new system, i'm unable to run my ram at it's rated speed and can't overclock my 290X to 1270/1600.

Hopefully these issues will get sorted asap and i'll be back with a better score.
 
Here's a bottleneck for you :)
With the third card, the score only goes up by 1K, but there's an extra 7K on the graphics.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4065648?

Need FS extreme or certain games to get three running at 99%. That, and a higher res :o

Clov!s said:
I don't have a 5960X, for some reason that's what it's reporting :p

I have a 5930K. :)
Click to expand...

Yeah, but still :D

Anyway, Shiari's beaten that with a 295x2....
 
Last edited:
I guess you're right. Would love to know how Matt managed those scores though...

290 x2 @1225/1575
2600K @5Ghz

Score 36764
Graphics Score 83385
Physics Score 11056
Combined Score 21560
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4066179?

290 x1 @1225/1575
2600K @5Ghz

Score 29071
Graphics Score 44828
Physics Score 11190
Combined Score 23460
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4066573?

Not sure why it reports stock gpu clocks on the last one.
 
Uncle Petey said:
I guess you're right. Would love to know how Matt managed those scores though...

290 x2 @1225/1575
2600K @5Ghz

Score 36764
Graphics Score 83385
Physics Score 11056
Combined Score 21560
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4066179?

290 x1 @1225/1575
2600K @5Ghz

Score 29071
Graphics Score 44828
Physics Score 11190
Combined Score 23460
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4066573?

Not sure why it reports stock gpu clocks on the last one.
Click to expand...

The CPU he used seemed to be very good on things where there are very high fps better even than my 4930k.

I used to think that IB-E was just a die shrink from SB-E but it is not, these two families of CPUs work in different ways.
 
Uncle Petey said:
I know! :D

Turns out my scores are relatively crap.

5Ghz -1220/1575 x3

SCORE 36720
Graphics Score 85026
Physics Score 11124
Combined Score 20294
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4065959?

:confused:

Matt's score with cards @stock for starters...
3. Score 41283, GPU 290P @975/1250, GFX Score 95324, Physics Score 12507, Combined Score 22928, CPU 2700k @5.3
Click to expand...

Uncle Petey said:
I guess you're right. Would love to know how Matt managed those scores though...

290 x2 @1225/1575
2600K @5Ghz

Score 36764
Graphics Score 83385
Physics Score 11056
Combined Score 21560
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4066179?

290 x1 @1225/1575
2600K @5Ghz

Score 29071
Graphics Score 44828
Physics Score 11190
Combined Score 23460
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4066573?

Not sure why it reports stock gpu clocks on the last one.
Click to expand...

Cpu bottlenecked bench Petey. This is where my hours spent fine tuning my memory, coupled with my 2700k that i pushed to 5.3Ghz paid dividends. In this scenario, you run your gpu's at stock they get better utilisation. Better utilisation = more fps.

Try running at stock, i bet your score goes up a bit.
 
AMDMatt said:
Cpu bottlenecked bench Petey. This is where my hours spent fine tuning my memory, coupled with my 2700k that i pushed to 5.3Ghz paid dividends. In this scenario, you run your gpu's at stock they get better utilisation. Better utilisation = more fps.

Try running at stock, i bet your score goes up a bit.
Click to expand...

It scored just slightly lower, but pretty much the same as the OC result.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom