• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

4p

Status
Not open for further replies.
tbh mate the a2 X4 is not a chip I was considering buying :p At that price range I would buy an i3, no question. Much lower power draw, great overclocking, great gaming performance (the x4 has a monster power draw).

My (off-topic, sorry Wayne) dilemna is between the el-cheapo x3 425/435 and the i3. No doubt that the i3 is the more expensive set-up there.

x3 + mobo + 2nd hand ram = £155
i3 + mobo + same ram = £210

I think Wayne's going to shout at me in a minute :p
 
However your like a drug pusher of AMD hardware and its not even that good in all honesty.Its mid range tat for skint people

I think your consistently offensive attitude in this thread does more harm than good.
Instead of a calm debate about the facts you seem to spend the whole time insulting people unless they agree with your CPU selection. This is patently strange..you are not selling these CPUs, nor are you Intel or AMD, if you want to shout people down surely there are open server first person shooters where you can do it in chat.

Anyway, on topic, while two AMD systems might be had for the price of one I7, would any one single user on a regular budget, buying hardware use 2 systems at once and buy 2 at the same time. Probably not. While someone might save the money from the other one and use it for something else, the performance is not directly comparable. I guess I am struggling to see why the comparison was made..is a Porsche worth 3 or 5 Renault Clios, well it depends what you want from your car/s, your budget and how much you care about saving vs not.

I learned a lot from this thread and others but I think the comparison in the OP is a little pointless BigWayne..I'd rather read an honest set of views on really comparable processors myself and avoid the willy waving this thread has spawned which, in my view, results from inviting AMD to be seen as a 'good enough' 'cheap' option when for some tasks its the better one (and some tasks not).

If I am investing in £700-1,000 worth of kit, I want the best I can get, not 'good enough'.

I am not brand loyal to Intel or AMD, but you may as well spec an Intel i3 system against an Intel extreme edition CPU and then say 'is it worth 5 times more'.

This is not to say the points are not interesting..without people making them I think it would be easy to write AMD off at the moment, I think you are right to say that Intel is like Ipod at present.
 
[On & Off Topic]

I did consider "investing in ddr2" as a justification for buying it now, but I can't quite bring myself to look at hardware as something which goes up in [value] with time
It's not the be all and end all but another layer to this great hobby of ours! :)

I assume everyone in life is completely ignorant until they demonstrate knowledge, and revise my model of them from this point
Ah, I'm the opposite really, I assume everyone possess a godly knowledge until they prove otherwise! :D . . . I used to be like you but being a smart *** didn't make me very popular or win me new friends! :o

Shadow Scotland wouldn't fit into any of them for example. I'm not sure you would either
Top banana but an evil bargain hunter! :p

I disagree with you here. The intelligent, uninformed reader will see it as a relative statement (and preferably question its validity). The less intelligent, uninformed reader will just see slow.
so according to what you said above that would be me, Shadow Scotland and yourself then with everyone else seeing slow! ;)

Unfortunately I don't care what the latter sees, as I don't really mind what other people buy and discussion with people who are incapable of spotting the difference between amd < intel and amd = 0 is likely to be tedious

Fair enough . . . I personally like the idea of people keeping money in their pockets, especially those who are fairly broke like students as the loan just isn't what it used to be! . . . I think an analogie of this that you may relate to would be that I feel the same seeing Joe-Freshman spending more money than he needs to in the same way you may feel when you see an empty PCI-E slot on a miniITX motherboard or perhaps the writing on Mario's Ban-Hammer being the wrong way up! . . . whos to say if they are sensible feelings or not but I think we can both agree it's something that bugs us! ;)

I think it's excellent that you're on a crusade to get people to buy the most sensible hardware for them, but I don't feel that strongly about it myself
Haha that's not the first time I've heard the term "crusade" used in context to my activities! :o

In fairness though I would say it's not just about getting people to buy "sensible hardware" it's more a case of opening up the plethora of routes they can take, with all the rhetoric and what not it may well be people are spending out more money than they can comfortably afford but do so because they consistantly hear the term "fast" and "fastest" associated with it so what choice do they have? . . . I mean who wants to buy a slow computer . . .

I think it's more important that the customer is happy
I agree 100% . . . many different routes to happiness! :)

For easyrider that would be having the fastest benchmark computer on the forums, for me that would be having the fastest *bang-for-buck* computer on the forums, for you that would be having the smallest miniITX computer on the forums etc!

it's hard to be sad that you bought a computer that is too fast.

it's hard to be pleased that you bought a computer that is too expensive when a cheaper option would have done the job just as well (not aimed at you btw!)

I'm in complete agreement with you on this one. I want the computer to do precisely what I asked it to with very low latency
Show me what you got big boy! :p

athloniilowlatency.png


I'm fairly broke, student loan just isn't what it (probably) used to be. However a fast computer lets me get work done a lot quicker. This either means a higher standard of work or more free time, either way it's good.
Sorry to be nosey but is your machine a tool that generates profit? . . . I am wondering if this is like someone who hasn't got that much money bit as long as they have the most powerful consumer computer in the world then things ain't to bad. I'd like to know what programs you run except Folding@home as I may download and run them to see how this AMD® Athlon™ II system performs . . .
 
it's hard to be pleased that you bought a computer that is too expensive when a cheaper option would have done the job just as well.


It can also be said of that I spent £250 on an Athlon II X4 mobo combo and just wish in hindsight I had spent the extra 30 quid on a faster PC that uses less power and is faster in games in i3:D

Swings and roundabouts really
 
I wish to thank Big.Wayne as of today im running my new AMD system and i couldnt be happier. The last amd system i had was a socket 939 then i went to my awesome intel dual core and now this:)

Heres my full spec:

AMD Phenom II X4 Quad Core 965 Black Edition 3.40GHz
Asus Crosshair III Formula
Corsair Dominator XMS3 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 16000C9D
BFG 280GTX OCX
128gb SSD
2x 500gb harddrive
windows 7 premium 64bit
24" Hyundai Monitor
dvd drive
Akasa Eclipse 62 case
Akasa Fan Controller
Senhesier HeadPhones
Zalman PSU 1000W
G15 Keyboard
Razor Mouse
 
I wish to thank Big.Wayne as of today im running my new AMD system and i couldnt be happier. The last amd system i had was a socket 939 then i went to my awesome intel dual core and now this:)

Heres my full spec:

AMD Phenom II X4 Quad Core 965 Black Edition 3.40GHz
Asus Crosshair III Formula
Corsair Dominator XMS3 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 16000C9D
BFG 280GTX OCX
128gb SSD
2x 500gb harddrive
windows 7 premium 64bit
24" Hyundai Monitor
dvd drive
Akasa Eclipse 62 case
Akasa Fan Controller
Senhesier HeadPhones
Zalman PSU 1000W
G15 Keyboard
Razor Mouse

Congrats

You do realise you could have gone i5 750 for less and had a faster PC at the same time?

AMD Phenom II X4 Quad Core 965 Black Edition 3.40GHz (Socket AM3) - Retail £143.98
(£122.54) £143.98
(£122.54)
Asus Crosshair III Formula AMD 790FX (Socket AM3) PCI-Express DDR3 Motherboard Asus Crosshair III Formula AMD 790FX (Socket AM3) PCI-Express DDR3 Motherboard £143.98
(£122.54) £143.98
(£122.54)
Corsair Dominator 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 PC3-12800C8 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit (CMD4GX3M2A1600C8) Corsair Dominator 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 PC3-12800C8 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit (CMD4GX3M2A1600C8) £139.99
(£119.14) £139.99
(£119.14)

Total : £439.12


This is what gets me about these threads.

Basically you have spent more and got a slower PC for all tasks.

I'm speechless:eek:
 
In Fact 30 quid more and you have the fastest, more memory.....Triple channel.


Either you have more money than sense or you just love AMD :p


Thanks a lot Big wayne why didn't you tell me that top end AMD was the same price as i7?

Thanks a bunch!

Intel Core i7 920 D0 Stepping (SLBEJ) 2.66Ghz (Nehalem) (Socket LGA1366) - Retail £209.98
(£178.71) £209.98
(£178.71)
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R Intel X58 (Socket 1366) DDR3 Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R Intel X58 (Socket 1366) DDR3 Motherboard £143.98
(£122.54) £143.98
(£122.54)
OCZ Gold 6GB (3x2GB) DDR3 PC3-10666C9 Low-Voltage Triple Channel (OCZ3G1333LV6GK) OCZ Gold 6GB (3x2GB) DDR3 PC3-10666C9 Low-Voltage Triple Channel (OCZ3G1333LV6GK) £116.99
(£99.57) £116.99
(£99.57)

Total : £482.13
 
Last edited:
Congrats

You do realise you could have gone i5 750 for less and had a faster PC at the same time?

AMD Phenom II X4 Quad Core 965 Black Edition 3.40GHz (Socket AM3) - Retail £143.98
(£122.54) £143.98
(£122.54)
Asus Crosshair III Formula AMD 790FX (Socket AM3) PCI-Express DDR3 Motherboard Asus Crosshair III Formula AMD 790FX (Socket AM3) PCI-Express DDR3 Motherboard £143.98
(£122.54) £143.98
(£122.54)
Corsair Dominator 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 PC3-12800C8 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit (CMD4GX3M2A1600C8) Corsair Dominator 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 PC3-12800C8 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit (CMD4GX3M2A1600C8) £139.99
(£119.14) £139.99
(£119.14)

Total : £439.12


This is what gets me about these threads.

Basically you have spent more and got a slower PC for all tasks.

I'm speechless:eek:

Dont worry im not speechless im very happy:)
 
Hello bakes0310! :)

bare with me I'm just composing another post . . can I ask you politely to not engage easyrider for a moment, at the very least can you edit his quotes in your post down or remove them!

Cool beans dude, back in a sec! :cool:

Why would that be?

The guy has bought slower hardware at the same cost of i7:eek:

You're dangerous!

In fact he has spent more money than i5 750 that poops all over that rig.

Fanboyism sucks!

Its a dreadful business.

It really is.:(:(:(:(:(:(
 
You have spent your hard earned cash on second best.

I just don't get it?

Please explain why?

BTW its a serious question.

I just need to know?

Thanks

Well tbh im sort of out the loop in the latest hardware. My basic understanding is the following:
i7 is expensive and is for encoders etc
i5 seems to be the gamer option
i3 i just thought it was just basically like pentuim 4's celeron
phenom II i believed to be amd top cpu (which it is, isnt it?) and the gamers choice.

So i had a choice between i5 and phenom II so i read a series of threads and big.waynes threads caught my eye.
So easyrider have i made a terrible mistake, because i think big.wayne is genuine when he talks about amd and making fair comparisons to intel and amd.
My budget was £500 no more and i had to buy the cpu/motherboard/ram and cpu cooler. Im very happy with my new toy, but will feel really bad if ive been duped into buying the wrong things.

Out of interest easyrider what should have i bought, and also whats your spec out of curiosity:)
 
I don't understand why people automatically think that i7 is for encoders...

Do you actually get people that use their PC's mostly for encoding??

If I had the budget to buy an i7 system, I wouldn't go and buy an AMD rig instead.
 
I don't understand why people automatically think that i7 is for encoders...

Do you actually get people that use their PC's mostly for encoding??

If I had the budget to buy an i7 system, I wouldn't go and buy an AMD rig instead.

read my first line, i hope it made it sound like im not ontop of the latest cpu info:)
 
bakes0310, is you rig noticebly quicker than the rig it replaced. If so, then i think you should be happy with your purchase.

In my opinion you could have gotten a less expensive motherboard, however the added options that mobo has over something vastly cheaper, is maybe why you got that mobo.

I wouldn't get stressed over easy's bluntness, take a look at this thread http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/272741-10-truth-phenom

If you are looking to game on your rig more than anything else apart from web surfing and document writing, then i would completely ignore easy.
 
Last edited:
Off Topic

Private and Confidential
F.A.O Mr easyrider


Hello easyrider . . . I'm hoping to engage the positive side of your personality here and would remind you it's Friday, the weeks work is done and it's time for a cold beer and to relax with your forum buddies . . . I fear you may not be in the best of moods but it would be great if we could chat as normal people without any agro . . .I don't want to fight, I don't want any form of conflict that cannot be *logically* resolved!

if you are able to demonstrate something logically then I'm keen to learn but alas if you release the Black Troll into these forums I won't be impressed, nor will anyone else . . .

I would also like to inform you that I intend to become more and more pro-active in these forums and am considering stepping up to become a Don, of course the role of a Don is to Moderate discussions before they become heated and turn more into flame wars than intelligent debate and discussion.

I would like to extend the olive branch to you and say that if I have said or done anything in the past to offend or upset you then I apologize . . . I hope you can find it in your heart to accept this apology . . . I am only a normal human being and have character flaws and also have bad days but I have been working on this and think I am moving in the right direction. I really don't want any uneeded conflict and I'm only here to share information and ideas and learn! :)

My ideas for the forums are with the help of the many gifted members we have turn OcUK forums into the worlds #1 resource for technology, a Technical-Mecca if you will. If you know anything about Mecca then you will know only certain people are allowed to enter . . .

I'm merely stating that i3 is faster at the same cost
Ok, well on the surface I want to be excited but something is holding me back? . . . I guess the reason for this is your statement is what is known as a Logical Fallacy, specifically Argumentum ad ignorantiam . .

"This is the fallacy of assuming something is true simply because it hasn't been proven false"

The *only* way we can work out if you statement is really fallacious or not depends crucially upon the burden of proof . . .

What you must do is create a thread similar to what I have done here and begin amassing as much data as possible on the performance figures of the Intel® Core™ i3 and do your very best to *demonstrate* it is the superior hardware, we have lots of useful forum members here that can help you and you would be doing us all a great favour . . .

By amassing this pool of data together you will be providing the proof but sadly the burden lay with you as you are the one making the claim. This is not a trick . . . If you can show us that the Intel® Core™ i3 is a demonstrably and consistently better performer than the AMD® Athlon™ II I and many other forum users will shower you with admiration because you would be saving us buying the wrong hardware

Now the cost thing £££ . . . well that's gonna take a lot more work to get you dealing figures that relate to the outside world but I'm confident we can get there!

Its mid range tat for skint people
Well that's nothing more than a subjective and obtuse statement, it's wasted on me but I'm sure a lot of people won't see this in a favourable light! :( and only serves to alienate you and make the forums look bad! . . . you want to be loved and not hated right?

I can help you easyrider but you gonna have to begin having some self-respect, only once this is achieved can you begin to respect others . . .

You haven't even posted in my Fritz Chessmark bench thread that I started and welcomed people with all cpu's.

Guess why I wonder? Fear of showing how " run of the mill" your hardware actually is?:o

i3 is dual core and beats wayne's true triple core in the multithreaded bench Fritz Chess.

If you are a teenager I can understand why you would write such things but if your a mature adult then there is a lot of scope for improvement here. Whatever you think about me or why I do things I can assure you that it's wrong, you got me dead wrong hehe! :p

Now going back to the talk of OcUk forums becoming a possible Technical Mecca I can inform you that this style of posting will not be suitable. It does not demonstrate or give the right impression of these forums that we all love so hopefully if we begin to co-operate better this will no longer happen. I know your keen to prove yourself as a technical guru and I think if we can *unleash* you in the right way you will be a much loved guy on these forums!

I understand a lot about you having engaged you many times over the years and I know you get *super dooper* frustrated when people don’t heed your advice, hopefully if you begin to construct informative threads with **** loads of data we will not be in any doubt over which hardware is better for our needs!

Now, in response to your statement above, I did post in your first thread (AMD® Athlon™ II X4 620 vs Intel® Core™ i3) although I only have a triple-core, I did submit a test result for your consideration but you didn't appear to like what you saw?

Please remember I am not a processor . . . I am a human being playing with the processor, I am sharing my findings and doing my bit for the forums so that people do not have to go outside, everything we need to know should be hear, no bull, no advertising related bias, just cold hard truth, tested by an OcUK overclocker (that’s us btw)

I'm not a Fan-Boy . . . I'm a Fan-Man! :p . . . the difference is I am guided by logic and have no bias . . . I am promoting AMD as I think they are extremely good products for an affordable price . . .

fritz2010.gif

Intel® Core™ i3 results by OcUK Top-Gun Topitoff

After you saw this result you went off and created another thread but this time you asked for both Fritz and Super-Pi because you knew the AMD® Athlon™ II *sucked* in Super-PI and you wanted to make it look bad (stacking the deck in your favour hehe) . . . as from your first thread with Fritz alone it looked pretty good actually, especially considering I only had a AMD® Athlon™ II X3 425/DDR2. If that had been a quad-core I think it could have bested the Intel® Core™ i3 . . . even with the AMD® Athlon™ II X4 620 at 3.6GHz

Now I understand what Fritz does as I used to be a Chess Player, but I'm not sure what Super-PI represents? (Real-World?) . . . I do know that it works better on processors that feature lots of cache but sadly the chip I am using only has 512Kb cache per core so super-PI is not great. I don't work with many programs that would fit into any amount of cache . . . anyway the point here is we all have to do our level best to show the hardware in as true a light as possible, not Skew the results out of pride/ego etc . . . neither of us want anyone to buy pants hardware right? . . . if we all can work together the end results would be better . . . if you like the competition then we can have friendly in-house benchwars but it's for fun, not war . .

Once we can unite all the overclockers and get to know everything about all hardware then we can begin to compete with other forums around the world, we can challenge XS to a benchwar etc . . . we can even develop our gaming community and begin to enter members into online gaming championships etc . . . if we all can just get along better and learn to co-operate then it's nothing short of digital World-Domination, benchmark championships, gaming championships, endorsements from the various hardware manufactures, chicks, beer and £££ $$$$, maybe even free pizza! :D

Its so obvious which is the superior hardware but some seem to not care and allow brand loyalty to blur their vision.
Well I do believe you have that entirely wrong, I have been looking into it for a while and I'm not sure what you are saying is in anyway based on fact? . . . please make a new dedicated thread and I'll help you out, I'm trying to lay my hands on an Athlon™ II X4 620 for testing purposes so between the group we will be able to determine which is the more suitable product or at least work out each processors strength and weaknesses etc . . .

I will always buy the best performing hardware within my price range however I am sure there are some people that will buy something out of pure brand loyalty but at the moment that ain't me! . . . even if people do this mate your gonna have to let it be, all you can do is tell them what you think and show them the massive amount of proof (from your thread) and the rest is up to them

I know how things have been in the past, but I here now to tell you how they are going to be in the future, if you want to be a part of it then you know what you need to do!

Your friend & foe (but wanting to be your friend)

Wayne

P.S: Still waiting for my beer! :cool:
 
Last edited:
bakes0310, is you rig noticebly quicker than the rig it replaced. If so, then i think you should be happy with your purchase.

In my opinion you could have gotten a less expensive motherboard, however the added options that mobo has over something vastly cheaper, is maybe why you got that mobo.

I wouldn't get stressed over easy's bluntness, take a look at this thread http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/272741-10-truth-phenom

If you are looking to game on your rig more than anything else apart from web surfing and document writing, then i would completely ignore easy.

Yep basically its a gaming rig, and even though ive only been playing with it for the past 8 hour or so im really happy with it. Ive got loads of games to reinstall on steam and tomorrow ill be testing crysis and mass effect 2 on it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom