Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Apr 2014
- Posts
- 7,425
- Location
- Hampshire
Sometimes it is the dog.
https://www.askadamskutner.com/dog-bites/bite-statistics-according-to-dog-breed/
https://www.dogsbite.org/dog-bite-statistics-fatalities-2019.php
![]()
If you're not keen on the source I've seen similar elsewhere from multiple sources.
Most of the time a violent or dangerous dog is the result of a poor owner, especially when said dogs are more energetic and on the larger side. I've been around many German Shepherds and English Mastiffs for example, my grandfather used to train German Shepherds for security/police work. Amazing animals when brought up properly by the right people. I would blame the owner 95% of the time for almost any animal on that list.
I'm not saying this is a case of a violent breed, but it is possible, and some animals are predisposed to be unpredictable no matter the owner, especially when Pit Bulls or crosses involving them are in question.
Be careful here, correlation doesn’t mean causation.
While a particular breed may be involved in more bites, you cannot conclude that the breed is more likely to bite someone.
E.g. could breed X be more likely to kept by owners which ill-treat breed X? Could there be more breed X?
Not saying you’re wrong, just that you have to look at the bigger picture with statistics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :-) :-)"