Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
It most certainly will.
Gibbo if you're reading this, get on the blower to Asus ASAP for some solid info, like GBP pricing and a release date
I was too busy sobering up last week
Will have a scratch around for your post on my lunch break!
Edit: found it
You mention it being an ips can you confirm this?
I can live with tn with those features slapped on top.
As I said earlier, £600 or less and I'm in
Any idea if it will be 3dvision certified?
Good question on the 3D.
According to 3dvision blog, it wasn't mentioned with the press release but say that could be down to it awaiting certification as it still has another ~4 months until release its 3dvision status could change at any point.
It would also mark the release of the first 3dvision monitor with a resolution above 1920x1080.
Would prefer them to knock $180 off the price instead of their apologyLooks like Asus have updated the info on their site with a "yes it is TN but trust us its a really good TN" style apology
Looks like Asus have updated the info on their site with a "yes it is TN but trust us its a really good TN" style apology
To be fair to them, my aging asus 120hz tn is a very good (imo) quality panel, colours are vibrant, blacks are deep and most importantly its never gone belly up.
I'm one of those that tend to stick with a brand after a good experience, so another asus screen suits me perfectly
Now of only I could afford 3 of these and the horsepower to drive them
Why is the display TN rather than IPS/PVA/MVA, etc?
Not all TN’s are made the same: the premium panel used in the PG278Q is of very high quality. IPS panels (and their derivatives like PVA/MVA etc) are not suitable for a multitude of reasons: 1) the response rate is simply not fast enough to react to the active change in refresh rate and 2) They cannot reliably achieve >60Hz without significantly affecting the quality of the image. IGZO technology (and LTPS – low temperature polysilicon – likewise) – yields 100′s of times faster electron mobility versus standard amorphous silicon panels – and thus can provide a response rate comparable to TN (up to 60Hz currently), but, however desirable this technology is, it is still currently cost prohibitively for many PC gaming enthusiasts in 2014, which is why ROG has used a better priceerformance, high quality TN panel.
^ThisTN is TN
I have vowed never to spend money on one again. Vote with your wallet!