Deleted member 651465
Deleted member 651465
I am bored but here goes... non ad-blocked on the left versus blocked on the right.
i'll let stupid people who have no ability to work out how to install addons for chrome et al to help fund that ad-money-maker.
This could have gone into the Internet forum but it will get more discussion here (maybe, and some of it might even be serious).
Talking to a friend, I have just realised that some people consider the use of adblockers etc. to be somehow wrong or immoral. I have never heard that viewpoint outside of people who obviously make ad money, so what gives? Surely people don't exist that LIKE being bombarded?
He says we shouldn't be taking away revenue, I'm saying they shouldn't be taking my time, bandwidth or attention. Maybe this isn't a new argument to the web but it's new to me and I don't really know how to argue my point.
My end goal is simply to watch BF4 game plays without watching an ad for fanny cream or whatever unrelated crap they want to shove at me.![]()
They spent painstaking hours editing and getting content BEFORE ad revenue came along. There were just fewer of them because there was nothing in it other than enjoyment and community.
I use Adblock on every site i go on except Youtube.
I watch a lot of content on there and majority of people I watch content from have it as their source of income, if myself watching a 20sec ad for 30mins of video helps the user to create more content I enjoy for free then thats fine.
Think how long you watch TV shows and how many ad's are displayed on that! Plus you pay for licence fee on top. IIRC The walking dead is "1hour" long show, around 15 mins is adverts (inc that dam joop ad) with 45 or less for the actual show. basically 25% of an hour long show is for adverts.
so the 30 sec for a youtube video seems quite good in comparison (most vids I watch are 20-30mins) especially when you can skip in 5sec.
Making crap does though.fun and community doesn't pay the bills bro.
From your sand in vagina moaning, I'd say their targeted advert was spot on.
Scary how good Google is getting isn't it!
P.s for the record I use Adblock + Ghostery.
If there was a way to keep ads disabled in general, but enable them based on specific circumstances, such as a select number of YouTube channels or Twitch streams, then I would be happy to have the odd ad to support my favourites (as there is a bit of revenue for an ad view)
However - as there is not an option to do that (as far as I'm aware) - then they're staying blocked for everything.
@@||twitch.tv/*CHANNELNAME$document
// ==UserScript==
// @name Expose Youtube Uploader Name in URL
// @namespace schippi
// @description Used to expose a Youtube uploaders displayname in the URL
// @include http://www.youtube.com/watch*
// @include https://www.youtube.com/watch*
// @version 1.2
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==
// Credits go to Schippi and Dubious for doing the base work which I've modified here.
var url = window.location.href;
if ( url.search( "channel=" ) == -1 )
{
if ( document.getElementById( "watch7-user-header" ) != null )
{
var channelNameContainer = document.getElementsByClassName("yt-user-name")[0];
//var channelName = channelNameContainer.innerHTML;
//The above 'channelName' is not used below. Could be an option instead of 'channelURL', but often contain spaces, and might not be unique.
var channelURL = channelNameContainer.getAttribute("href");
channelURL = channelURL.replace( '/user/', '' );
//window.location.href = url + "&channel=" + channelName; //alterative for name insertion rather than channel-url.
window.location.href = url + "&channel=" + channelURL;
}
}
@@||youtube.com/*channel=CHANNELNAME$document
Adblocker is on for every site on my desktop... seriously, the ads are usually pretty intrusive on the sites I visit.