What would you rather?
1.) I like this game, it is so addicting!
or
2.) I like this game, addicting it is so!
?????
no I would like ""I like this game, it is so addictive".
What would you rather?
1.) I like this game, it is so addicting!
or
2.) I like this game, addicting it is so!
?????
Ii can't think of any examples where addicting should be used...
no I would like ""I like this game, it is so addictive".
Yeah there is, it sounds "wrong". whats wrong with just using "addictive" which, in general, definately sounds like it "fits" a whole lot better.
The Super Nintendo is better then the Megadrive
Now that really annoys me, good shout.Never seen that before
Annoying me at the moment is people leaving out the word 'to'.
"I'm going Prague next week"
No you're not, you dullard, you're going TO Prague next week.
do you know what else grinds my gears?
do you know what else grinds my gears?
No mate, I can't read your bloody mind. Sand in your gearbox perhaps?
Can't say I've seen that before.
It's in the Oxford English Dictionary.
Sand in your gearbox perhaps?
Where did this vile new grammar fail come from? Seeing it all over the palce recently. I don't normally get irritated by this sort of thing (indeed, I usually spew grammar mistakes like a machine gun when typing), but this one seems like nails on a blackboard to me.
Usage example:
No! No it isn't you stupid inbred ****! FFFFFUUUUUUU..... etc.
May I throw in the monumental retardedness that is the usage of the word 'seen' when people mean 'seeing'?
I see it all over the place on here, too much for it just to be a random typing mistake