Adolescence | Netflix

Ok, I gave this a go, I don't understand what the hype is about.. I felt asleep on it twice now, so that's a bonus I suppose. :D
 
Last edited:
My wife said the same but within 30 mins of the first episode it’s beyond doubt that he did it so I’m not sure what value a trial scene would add. It’s not really a traditional crime drama.
Yes I liked how it didnt focus on whether or not he did it which is the more common way for stories like this
 
Saw a clip of this. A scene between the boy and what i assume was a Counseller. I think the intention was that it would be powerful, intelligent and intimidating. Came across to me as a mess and artificial.
Well done, you saw an out of context clip for a 4 hour show and reviewed it based on that.
 
Saw a clip of this. A scene between the boy and what i assume was a Counseller. I think the intention was that it would be powerful, intelligent and intimidating. Came across to me as a mess and artificial.

I'm not sure what the fuss is about this "lord of the rings" it's just a stupid horse film with men lying in fields with corny dull deaths.
 
Last edited:
See I don't know what to think here. I remember being a kid with a computer and at 1am I'm either jacking it for the 10th time that day or playing age of empires 2.

I don't think I needed my dad coming into my room and telling me to go to bed in either of those situations, especially when I had school holidays so 1am wasn't an issue bed time.

I was exactly the same, however I think it's important to remember that 20 years ago when we were doing that, the internet wasn't nearly as ubiquitous as it is now - it was largely the domain of "geeks" and "nerds". If you were playing/communicating online with someone, chances are it was someone you already knew, and the level of communication was limited; none of this instant 4k video etc. You & your classmates didn't all have smartphones and social media accounts where you could harass each other 24/7. There was nowhere near the same level of "fake news" and constant drive for engagement regardless of content quality.

It's a very different landscape now, and IMO at least - while it's a lot more accessible - it certainly hasn't changed for the better. A perfect example was posted previously in the thread:

Not sure if this was posted before, but seeing what Netflix has been up to, I wouldn't be surprised..


Is this true?

Even the first sentence saying what the show is apparently about is inaccurate, which means one of 2 things:

The poster of that content hasn't watched the show and is just jumping on the bandwagon
The poster of that content is deliberately posting misinformation

The concerning thing is that doesn't matter. The content is irrelevant, the truth is irrelevant - all they are concerned about is driving engagement; positive/negative it doesn't matter, the more controversial the better. They want the angry comments, the hate, the arguments. Engagement = increased exposure = money.

This becomes a problem when people start believing the lies which are designed to anger them. When those people are kids/teens who haven't yet developed the tools to research those "facts" it warps their world view, makes them extremely angry about things which don't even actually exist.

I didn’t get that impression at all. The entire final section of dialogue was focussed around what the parents didn’t do; to what extent was it their fault? In the end they said they couldn’t accept responsibility for their own sanity but they regretted not doing better.

If anything I think the episode was commentary on how ‘children being left alone in the safety of their homes’ doesn’t make them safe… that’s not an attack on media; it’s a cautionary tale for well-meaning parents that take their eye off the ball because they aren’t mistreating their children in any ‘obvious’ way.

Due to its content, this forum is weighted towards those of us who are significantly more technical (and I'd guess probably educated to a higher level on average) than the general population.

As a parent to a 13 year old boy, some of the content which can easily be accessed is very concerning. I'm fortunate to have a technical background and have put various measure in place across the network and his devices to limit access to that content as much as possible.

I can easily see how to non-technical parents it is absolutely daunting with no idea where to even start - if it's even something that crosses their minds!

Even on supposedly "kid friendly" services such as Youtube Kids there is plenty of content which isn't really appropriate. My youngest has recently become obsessed with "Sprunki". "Cute" little humanoid creatures which were originally created as skins for "incredibox", which from what I can tell is some kind of music game. They each play a certain musical loop, and the kids can turn them on and off to make their own little song.

Sounds fun and innocent... Except it seems that plenty of "lovely" people out there have started making gore cartoons featuring the characters, quite a lot of which is still easily available on these "kid friendly" services.

Short of completely disabling any kind of internet connection for him (which I've done a couple of times while I've figured out how to stop that stuff coming up) it's virtually impossible to block everything inappropriate.
 
Last edited:
I've taken the plunge ... Very well produced.

So far Feels like an education show for parents. Which is as expected
Sprinkle in the mesogonist incel words. Mention Tate. I don't even disagree with the shows message. It's again, not aimed at me.
 
Last edited:
I have seen opinion pieces recently saying this is just to grease up the public for accepting increasingly restrictive changes to the Online Safety Bill so I’m not surprised.
Exactly 100% this is being used to scare parents into agreeing with anything. Looking in from the outside at least. Well played Starmar.
 
Last edited:
I watched it and found it a bit dull to be honest. It seems like it's getting a lot of praise and attention because of the gen Z online subject matter rather than because it was a particularly entertaining show
 
I watched it and thought it was excellent, thought it was well made, had a good script and felt quite authentic.

As much as the government sucks, they're stuck between a rock and a hardplace on this issue, because it's a large-scale pervasive problem with no simple or quick solution, they have no choice other than to ban things left-right and centre (which never works).
 
Back
Top Bottom