I have a arctic cooler 2 360mm, do i need new mounting kit?
Yeah
https://www.arctic.de/en/LGA1700-Mounting-Kit-Liquid-Freezer-II-Series/MPSAS00891A
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I have a arctic cooler 2 360mm, do i need new mounting kit?
I have a arctic cooler 2 360mm, do i need new mounting kit?
Mounting kit and pump cover IIRC. Someone posted in this about it.
yep. Mounting kit and pump cover. I only found out about the pump cover when I looked at the manual for the ADL fitting kit
I just need DDR5 memory to come in stock.
yep. Mounting kit and pump cover. I only found out about the pump cover when I looked at the manual for the ADL fitting kit
I just need DDR5 memory to come in stock.
12900k is around 500 sold, it’s most popular SKU. The rest were a bit slow but sales are now accelerating especially the 12600K.
AMD launch had far less stock but the demand was even higher.
Once motherboard supply catches up the sales will boost, DDR5 will help too but a decent DDR4 3600 kit is all you need.
It would be useful to know the configuration. Would it be possible to make an order for say 8 sets of 2R and 8 sets of 1R?
Thanks for the heads up.
Is this on their store page?
Was looking at a be-quiet dark 4 pro, but read reviews it won't cool well enough on the 12700k and above. My case just won't take a cooler big enough and I don't really want the extra expense.
Probably going to cross fingers and AMD reduce prices.
It’s only Grim. He does **** like that all the time. He also upgrades every year for some reason, like as if he is trying to compensate for somethingIf people start saying 1.5% increase is "destroying" then expect cpus from now on to be 1-3% faster so they can claim it destroys the previous gen .. Like how we ended up with GPUs because people were happy with 20-30% gen over gen at best now, from when we use to get 100% and more increase from gen to gen.
This mentality will end bad for us consumers. Intel did good but they have done nothing more than catch up to AMD. Reality not made up facts to create drama.
Geeze really.
Exactly. For once you make sense Matt!Agree. For me destroy would probably be something like 40-50% faster, that would be a big lead. But a few percent?
Slightly faster seems more apt, which it is.
Law of averages says you have to be right sometimes.Exactly. For once you make sense Matt!![]()
New drinking game; take a swig every time he says ADL surpasses Ryzen by 20-30%.Then maybe you should learn to think for yourself and analyse the data reviewers are giving you. There is not a single number or result that constitutes "destroy", "crush" or "dunks" in any of Intel's performance wins. But please feel free to mindlessly parrot click-bait hyperbole, just be prepared to be called out for it.
Law of averages says you have to be right sometimes.![]()
Not sure why you are talking tbh , you do the exact same thing but for the other side. Reading your posts makes me want to buy an Intel CPUThe biggest thing putting me off is the likes of Dave2150 and SeeNoWeevil.
Not sure why you are talking tbh , you do the exact same thing but for the other side. Reading your posts makes me want to buy an Intel CPU![]()
If people start saying 1.5% increase is "destroying" then expect cpus from now on to be 1-3% faster so they can claim it destroys the previous gen .. Like how we ended up with GPUs because people were happy with 20-30% gen over gen at best now, from when we use to get 100% and more increase from gen to gen.
This mentality will end bad for us consumers. Intel did good but they have done nothing more than catch up to AMD. Reality not made up facts to create drama.
Geeze really.